VA official defends memos restricting IT centralization

The Veterans Affairs Department's chief legal officer on Thursday defended memorandums opposing attempts to centralize authority over technology, telling legislators that he based them on the laws governing federal information security.

A lack of central authority to enforce information security policies at the VA has become a focus of lawmakers who are examining last month's massive data breach.

House Veterans' Affairs Committee Chairman Steve Buyer, R-Ind., said at a hearing Thursday that memos signed by VA General Counsel Tim McClain contributed to the weak security controls culminating in the data breach. Agency officials responsible for enforcing security policies did not have the necessary authority, he said.

"It is incongruent to say one has responsibility, but no authority," Buyer told McClain, referring to the general counsel's decision on a directive from then-VA Secretary Anthony Principi. "We ended up with a legal opinion that is a heterodox opinion."

A March 2004 memo from Principi stated that then-CIO Robert McFarland was responsible for implementing a departmentwide information security program.

But a subsequent memo from McClain weakened that directive. In his testimony McClain said the Principi memo merely asserted the secretary's "intention" to grant McFarland the "power and authority needed" to enforce information security policies.

McClain said he would not retract either of two memos, one dated Aug. 1, 2003, and the other April 7, 2004, finding that the chief information security officer lacked the authority under the 2002 Federal Information Security Management Act to hold organizations and individuals within the department accountable for information security.

"The opinions state the opinion of the law when they were written," McClain said. "I think that if the CIO had additional authority, it would make his particular job easier. But that is a policy discussion, not a legal one."

There are a number of actions the VA CIO could take to enforce security policies, McClain said, including blocking individuals from accessing systems, but the law does not by default give the technology chief authority to enforce policies.

"I am responsible for interpreting those laws and how they apply to our business in the VA," McClain said. "What we're saying is that the current state of the law does not give the CIO these powers. Had the secretary desired to make a change, he could have delegated the authority to the CIO."

Buyer said he will work to change FISMA, which has been heavily criticized by Bruce Brody, the department's associate deputy assistant secretary for cyber and information security at the time McClain's memos were issued, and other information security experts. Changes under consideration include eliminating ambiguities regarding the responsibilities and authority of agency CIOs.

McClain said that the department's "federated" IT management model, adopted last year, will give the chief information officer the necessary authority and enforcement powers to improve information security, including direct authority over the department's 4,000 IT employees.

But Brody said that the "federated" model has legitimized the department's "culture of resistance," and Buyer called it an excuse for a lack of security controls.

A high-profile Purdue University computer science professor who is an expert on information security backed Brody.

"There is no centralized point of authority to ensure that rules, procedures and good practices are instituted and observed," Eugene Spafford said. "There is no centralized position that has all three components necessary to effectively manage information security: resources, accountability and authority."

He said the authority to make changes to information security policies and to fire staff for bad behavior should be consolidated in one officer.

Buyer also said he was not satisfied with the department's announcement Wednesday that it will provide free credit monitoring for those affected by the data breach. Buyer and witnesses noted that potential identity thieves could create criminal records in addition to bad credit records for the affected individuals.

Buyer also criticized the House Judiciary Committee for passing a bill, H.R. 5520, on Thursday. The bill would create a special office to deal with veterans' claims resulting from identity theft. He implicitly criticized the committee for moving the legislation without consulting his panel.

"It's inconsiderate," he said.

Sarah Lai Stirland of National Journal's Technology Daily contributed to this report.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.