OMB official: Too soon to judge computer security law

The Federal Information Security Management Act isn't old enough for its most effective provisions to prompt great cybersecurity improvements, an Office of Management and Budget official said Thursday.

The act, known as FISMA, took effect in 2002. It called for agencies, over a period of as long as two years, to identify and categorize their information technology systems according to the level of risk that a compromise would pose. The second phase is implementing security controls based on those risks, a process that's been going on for only 18 to 24 months, said Glenn Schlarman, OMB branch chief for information policy and technology. He spoke Thursday on a breakfast panel sponsored by Government Executive.

The controls phase "is new, and that has never been done anywhere by anyone," Schlarman said. The federal government has "some very strong pockets of security, and some really weak pockets of security," he added.

FISMA lately has been criticized as a paper-based exercise divorced from the real needs of cybersecurity. The law "measures the wrong things, and it measures the wrong things the wrong way," said Bruce Brody, also a panelist at the breakfast. He is a former federal cybersecurity chief and recently became a vice president at INPUT, a Reston, Va.-based government market analysis firm.

The federal government is making little headway in tackling cybersecurity problems, said Alan Paller, the third breakfast panelist and director of research at the SANS Institute, a nonprofit cybersecurity research organization. "In order to make progress, you actually [have] to reduce the problem a little bit, [but] the problem is being made harder," he said.

A chief information security officer in the audience, who asked not to be identified, said FISMA can be effective, depending on how it is implemented. The official cited the process of certification and accreditation of IT systems, saying, "if you want to do C&A the [Defense Department] way, you will not succeed." The process requires agencies to account for all their systems, implement risk-based technical controls and formally authorize systems' continued operation.

Although the certification and accreditation process predates FISMA by decades, it is a key measurement that Congress uses in its annual score card assessing compliance with the law. But the process heavily contributes to the ineffectiveness of FISMA, Brody and Paller contended. Nobody reads the accompanying reports, Paller said, and the money spent on paying contractors to prepare those reports would be better used on real-time monitoring.

The Defense Department follows a particularly burdensome and paper-filled certification and accreditation process, the federal official said. But, "if you're doing this right, you're doing this smart; you're not doing this as a paper exercise," the official said.

Continuous testing and monitoring of IT systems is part of FISMA compliance, Schlarman said. "If it isn't being done that way, then we have an implementation issue."

The law has called attention to the serious problem of cybersecurity, Brody said. But "there are some evolutionary possibilities that could take FISMA and the regulatory environment to another level," he said. "Benjamin Franklin said the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.