Panel raises questions about government data sharing

A group of experts in technology policy and civil liberties pondered the problem of government information sharing Tuesday and raised more questions than they answered. The panelists included Jim Dempsey, executive director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, Tim Edgar of the American Civil Liberties Union, and Kim Taipale of the Center for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology Policy. Dan Gallington of the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies moderated the panel discussion which was hosted by the Potomac Institute. Aside from the current congressional debate about naming a national intelligence director and giving that person budgetary authority, one of the big elements of efforts to overhaul the intelligence system involves how information on terrorism-related activity can be collected, stored, accessed and shared across all levels of government. In August, President Bush issued an executive order that aimed to improve the information-sharing practices of the intelligence and homeland security communities. The order directs the attorney general, Homeland Security secretary and director of central intelligence to recommend "executive-branch-wide collection and sharing requirements, procedures, and guidelines for terrorism information" from both publicly available sources and non-governmental databases. At the forum, Dempsey said the recommendations should focus on particular suspicions that the government may have about individuals. For example, he suggested that law enforcement agencies and investigators should only have access to the identities of people in government databases if their investigations if they have probable cause to suspect those people of crimes. Gallington said he rejected the idea that the executive order focuses on narrow solutions. Rather, he said he hopes the recommendations will involve some creative thinking and solutions to the issue of government-wide information sharing. The ACLU's Edgar agreed with Dempsey on the need for the government to base its investigations and use of shared data on particular suspicions. He cited former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover's wiretapping of Martin Luther King in the past as an example of how the process of unchecked surveillance can be abused. Edgar also posed various questions about current efforts to change information-sharing practices, including questions about the scope of the information collected and the limits of sharing it over government-wide networks. He also questioned how individuals would be able to correct mistakes and how much access private data companies would have to government-collected data. "To me, that's one of the biggest potential areas of greatest abuse," he said.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.