Senate votes for privacy study on agencies' data-mining use

Federal agencies that use data-mining technologies will be required to submit a report to Congress on the privacy impact of their activities under the Senate-passed fiscal 2005 Homeland Security Department spending bill.

An amendment offered by Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Russ Feingold, D-Wis., was unanimously accepted. The Senate passed the bill, H.R. 4567, on Tuesday on a 93-0 vote. The House version of the bill, passed in June, does not contain such an amendment.

"At the same time that the [Bush] administration has been making it harder and harder for the public to learn what government agencies are up to, the government and its private sector partners have been quietly building more and more databases to learn and store more information about the American people," Leahy said in a statement.

The amendment essentially adopted the approach of S. 1544, a Feingold-Leahy bill that would have required annual data-mining reports. As amended, the appropriations bill would only require a single report to Congress, within 90 days of the end of fiscal year that ends on Sept. 30, 2005.

Leahy said the amendment would not end any existing program or impose new regulations over how programs are administered. "This is about accountability," he said. "The American people deserve to know what kind of information is gathered about them and how federal agencies intend to store and use it."

A Leahy aide said that the senator "is open to the concept that certain forms of data mining might enhance security. His concern is that whenever you are going to use the technology, you put in place protections for people's privacy."

The administration's data-mining programs have proven controversial with Congress in the past. An amendment by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., in an appropriations bill passed in February 2003 required the Defense Department to address the privacy impact of a program initially dubbed "Total Information Awareness (TIA)."

The May 2003 report required by that bill left Congress unsatisfied, and the 2004 appropriations bill barred all funding for TIA-related activities.

In June 2004, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved an amendment by Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., that would have barred funding for an updated version of the Computer Assistant Passenger Pre-Screening System (CAPPS II), designed to track air travelers, until privacy concerns were addressed. That measure was also included in the House-passed version of this year's Homeland Security measure.

Previous legislation required the Government Accountability Office, to study the program, and it received a poor rating from the investigative arm of Congress, then known as the General Accounting Office.

In July, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge announced that the CAPPS II program was being scrapped, and a revised version of the program, dubbed "Secure Flight," was launched in August. It is unclear whether the program will engage in data-mining of the sort envisioned for CAPPS II.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.