House seeks more supercomputing funds

Disappointed with President Bush's budget request for high-end computing, House lawmakers are seeking to boost Energy Department efforts to strengthen U.S. competitiveness in the field.

"The committee is disappointed that the efforts of the High-End Computing Revitalization Task Force ... did not translate into increased fiscal year 2005 funding requests for advanced scientific computing," the House Appropriations Committee said in a report on the bill to fund Energy programs in fiscal 2005.

The interagency task force, led by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, recently released its findings and recommendations on U.S. supercomputing capabilities.

The House-passed bill, H.R. 4614, would provide $234 million for the Energy's supercomputing activities -- an increase of $30 million over Bush's request. House lawmakers passed the measure June 25 by a vote of 370-16. The Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee could debate its version of the legislation this week.

Lawmakers have been concerned that the United States is losing its competitive edge since Japan introduced the world's fastest computer, known as the Earth Simulator, in March 2002.

"The committee provides these additional funds to support the office of science initiative to develop the hardware, software and applied mathematics necessary for a leadership-class supercomputer to meet scientific computation needs," the report said. It stipulated that not more than $25 million could be used for hardware.

The panel also encouraged the department to make "substantial time available on its new leadership-class supercomputer" to national laboratories, government agencies and universities on a competitive basis.

The language is similar to provisions in separate measures, H.R. 4218 and H.R. 4516, that the House is expected to approve Wednesday. The first bill would require the National Science Foundation and Energy Department to grant U.S. researchers access to high-end computers, and the other would mandate that the department build supercomputing facilities for academic and government researchers.

While the committee sought to bolster U.S. competitiveness in the field, it reduced funding for supercomputing efforts to manage the nation's nuclear-weapons stockpile. The panel proposed $666 million -- $75 million less than Bush sought -- for advanced simulation and computing at the National Nuclear Security Administration because the agency has not worked with committee lawmakers to justify the scope, cost and schedule of the program, according to the bill report.

The panel said the agency should use $10 million for power and fiber-optic upgrades and for developing a technology training center, as well as for hardware and software upgrades for the Ohio Supercomputer Center in Springfield, Ohio. The agency also should use $2.5 million to complete the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's 3-D "chip-scale packaging" activities.

Lawmakers have been frustrated by the program's lack of progress over the nearly 10 years it has been in operation. The government started the initiative to ensure the safety and adequacy of the nuclear-weapons stockpile by conducting computer simulations of nuclear explosions rather than live testing.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.