GAO finds Homeland Security lacks data-sharing plan

The Homeland Security Department lacks a workable information-sharing plan, according to a report released Tuesday by the Government Accountability Office.

While the agency has taken steps to improve its sharing capability, "challenges remain," the report said. The department needs input from information sharing and analysis centers (ISACs), sector coordinators and sector-specific agencies to ensure the those challenges are addressed, according to GAO.

Homeland Security has not developed a plan that describes exactly how it will execute its information-sharing responsibilities and relationships, the report said. Anna Dixon, the agency's GAO liaison, said in a June letter that the department "has informed Congress of our plans to develop a timeline this summer for a 'roadmap' that documents the current information-sharing relationships." GAO encourages that move as a way to clarify the roles and responsibilities of all those involved and clearly articulate actions to address any remaining challenges, the report said.

Internally, however, Homeland Security lacks the policies and procedures needed to ensure appropriate information sharing, GAO said. This "could affect its overall ability to perform analysis and disseminate critical information about incidents, vulnerabilities, or threats."

For example, the infrastructure coordination division of the department's information analysis and infrastructure protection division handles ISAC information sharing. However, ISACs could talk with various departments on certain issues. GAO said the national cyber-security division or Homeland Security operations center could handle cyber issues, for example.

The department said it has no intention of developing one point of contact for ISACs within the department but will craft policies and procedures. It did not specify a timeline.

In addition to issues within Homeland Security, the ISACs identified several issues requiring further federal action. Government agencies and ISACs need to build trusted relationships in order to share information, but that "may be difficult because sector-specific agencies may also have a regulatory role," the report said.

In addition, those ISACs already receiving information said they need "specific, timely and actionable" data. This could prove difficult when many government and private-sector entities are not aware of their own roles. In particular, officials for several ISACs want a better definition of the department's role with respect to them.

GAO also urged government officials not to overlook private-sector analytical efforts and to integrate them into the federal processes for a more complete understanding. ISACs also stressed the need for continued funds to facilitate information sharing.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.