Homeland Security has no plans to update cybersecurity strategy

The time for reviewing the federal cybersecurity strategy has not come yet despite flaws that need to be addressed, a top official said Thursday.

"There is no effort to update" the strategy issued by the White House early in 2003, said Amit Yoran, director of the Homeland Security Department cyber-security division. The strategy was identified as a "snapshot in time," he said.

Yoran said after a speech at a SecureE-Biz.net conference that new issues have arisen since the strategy was released, such as a focus on securing "control systems" for infrastructure like chemical manufacturing or power systems. In addition, he acknowledged that problems exist in areas such as information-sharing analysis centers for various sectors and full industry support for federal efforts.

Another area of concern is the performance of the national cyber-alert system, which Yoran said is "mixed." For instance, he said some people think the technical alerts issued under the system are too technical.

The government is trying to find the right amount of alerts to send. "We're trying to walk the balance between not crying wolf and focusing people's attention on key issues," he said. At the same time, the government continues to offer information for experts about computer worms, viruses and other issues that occur.

"It is not the government's intention to be the first one out there to say, 'Hey, something is going on,'" he said. "The private sector has a finely tuned machine" for that purpose, and the government works collaboratively with it.

Generally, the federal government has approached cybersecurity in a two-pronged effort, Yoran said. Experts are working to improve preparedness for problems, meaning better identification of attacks and dissemination of information and security patches.

He said the other approach is strategic, as opposed to tactical, and involves trying to break the "vicious cycle" of the traditional "cat and mouse" game of trying to catch attackers. "We have to make a focused and strategic effort if this cycle is ever to end," he said.

The private sector is key to that success, Yoran said, and the agency is working to encourage improved software development with more secure code, and to improve evaluation methods for finding bugs and malicious code sent by developers, whether they are foreign or domestic.

He said Homeland Security will continue to invest in that, as well as ways to counter cyber crime, test data sets and improve methods for the economic analysis of cyber attacks. "We're looking at technology as the soft underbelly of all the nation's critical infrastructure," Yoran said.

Homeland Security works within an interagency group that includes all agencies with significant cybersecurity authority, including the Defense and State departments, the National Security Agency, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Despite problems, the department will continue to rely on market forces to drive improvement in cyber security, Yoran said. "We're early in these market influences to say we're ready to cut bait in terms of our policies."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.