House, Senate split difference on Energy supercomputing funds

Lawmakers voted to provide more funding than President Bush requested for key science and technology efforts at the Energy Department in a spending bill cleared a week ago.

The House on Nov. 18 adopted the compromise version of a bill, H.R. 2754, to fund energy and water programs in fiscal 2004. The vote was 387-36. The Senate cleared the measure by voice vote the same day. President Bush has yet to sign it into law.

House and Senate negotiators compromised on funding for Energy's supercomputing research, providing $203 million. The House-passed version had called for $213 million, compared with the Senate's $183 million. The final number exceeded Bush's request by $30 million.

"The conferees provide these additional funds for the department to acquire additional advanced computing capability ... to initiate longer-term research and development on next-generation computer architectures," the conference report on the bill said. "The conferees expect that ... these funds will be awarded among various technologies, laboratories, universities and private-sector suppliers using a merit-based, competitive process."

Lawmakers did not specify how the money should be split among Energy's divisions that conduct supercomputing research. But they said that they support the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy task force on high-end computing revitalization "and expect the department to participate fully in this interagency effort."

Negotiators accepted the Senate's number of $726 million for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-autonomous agency that uses supercomputing to manage the nation's nuclear weapons.

In another competitive science field, the lawmakers voted to provide $221 million for construction of nanoscience research facilities--$28 million over the president's request. Nanotechnology, which is the manipulation of matter at the molecular level, is estimated to become a $1 trillion market.

The fiscal 2004 funding comes after Congress on Thursday passed a bill that would authorize nearly $4 billion over the next four years -- starting in fiscal 2005 -- for the coordination of federal nanotechnology programs.

Negotiators on the energy and water spending bill also voted to provide $304 million, a $3.6 million increase over the president's budget, for safeguards and security, including cyber security, at Energy's environmental management office.

And the conference report questioned the decision by the North American Electric Reliability Council to omit certain systems from its recently announced definition for "critical cyber assets." "[T]he conferees encourage the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to ensure that process control systems, switching stations and substations are adequately protected by any cyber-security standards issued for the national power grid," the report said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.