House, Senate split difference on Energy supercomputing funds

Lawmakers voted to provide more funding than President Bush requested for key science and technology efforts at the Energy Department in a spending bill cleared a week ago.

The House on Nov. 18 adopted the compromise version of a bill, H.R. 2754, to fund energy and water programs in fiscal 2004. The vote was 387-36. The Senate cleared the measure by voice vote the same day. President Bush has yet to sign it into law.

House and Senate negotiators compromised on funding for Energy's supercomputing research, providing $203 million. The House-passed version had called for $213 million, compared with the Senate's $183 million. The final number exceeded Bush's request by $30 million.

"The conferees provide these additional funds for the department to acquire additional advanced computing capability ... to initiate longer-term research and development on next-generation computer architectures," the conference report on the bill said. "The conferees expect that ... these funds will be awarded among various technologies, laboratories, universities and private-sector suppliers using a merit-based, competitive process."

Lawmakers did not specify how the money should be split among Energy's divisions that conduct supercomputing research. But they said that they support the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy task force on high-end computing revitalization "and expect the department to participate fully in this interagency effort."

Negotiators accepted the Senate's number of $726 million for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-autonomous agency that uses supercomputing to manage the nation's nuclear weapons.

In another competitive science field, the lawmakers voted to provide $221 million for construction of nanoscience research facilities--$28 million over the president's request. Nanotechnology, which is the manipulation of matter at the molecular level, is estimated to become a $1 trillion market.

The fiscal 2004 funding comes after Congress on Thursday passed a bill that would authorize nearly $4 billion over the next four years -- starting in fiscal 2005 -- for the coordination of federal nanotechnology programs.

Negotiators on the energy and water spending bill also voted to provide $304 million, a $3.6 million increase over the president's budget, for safeguards and security, including cyber security, at Energy's environmental management office.

And the conference report questioned the decision by the North American Electric Reliability Council to omit certain systems from its recently announced definition for "critical cyber assets." "[T]he conferees encourage the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to ensure that process control systems, switching stations and substations are adequately protected by any cyber-security standards issued for the national power grid," the report said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.