Tech industry doubts about focus on cybersecurity linger

For some lobbyists, the fact that the Homeland Security Department chose to outline its new cybersecurity division's place on the bureaucratic ladder on a Friday afternoon last week was not a coincidence. It signaled to them that cybersecurity issues are not the highest priority as the department's leaders work to morph 22 agencies into a working organization.

"They always seem to make their cyber announcements at the very last minute on Fridays, when no one is paying attention and members are out of town," said one high-tech lobbyist, who noted that the final strategy on cybersecurity also was released on a Friday afternoon in February, with little notice to press or industry.

The timing of the announcement comes after other developments on the cybersecurity front that have concerned such lobbyists.

On March 1, when the White House dissolved the Critical Infrastructure Protection Board (CIPB), which wrote the cyber strategy, no replacement for the board's leadership was named. Cybersecurity experts in the high-tech world were left guessing the direction of the administration's cybersecurity policy for months. Some lobbyists said it was because the administration originally had no plan to create a cyber division within Homeland Security.

Also in March, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge told Congress that cybersecurity is important but that he sees it as intertwined with physical security. According to sources, Howard Schmidt, then co-chair of the CIPB, met with Ridge to argue that a senior person was needed within the department to oversee cybersecurity alone, but Ridge's staff was not convinced of that need, one lobbyist said. Schmidt left his position at the White House last month to join eBay.

"There was a group of senior officials ... that believed cybersecurity is no different than water or energy security ... and that cyber shouldn't be given some special carve-out," one lobbyist said. That source added that some people in the administration believed that cries about impending technology problems, like the outcries about the Year 2000 computer glitch, were overblown.

Meanwhile, high-tech lobbyists and several prominent lawmakers-such as House Government Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va.- continued to push the administration and Homeland Security officials to create a senior cybersecurity position.

In the end, the two met in the middle. The department created a 60-person cyber division-but not at the senior level that the tech industry had wanted.

Robert Liscouski, the assistant Homeland Security secretary for infrastructure protection, said last week that the cyber division would have been "dysfunctional" anywhere else within the department and assured the high-tech sector that Ridge will be actively involved in cyber policy.

Now lobbyists are guessing who will be named as director of the division. That speculation has centered on: Michael Aisenberg, VeriSign's director of public policy; Julia Allen, technical staff member of the CERT Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University; Kathy Burton, a former National Communications System official; Computer Sciences Corp. Vice President Guy Copeland; and Oracle Chief Security Officer Mary Ann Davidson.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.