Budget chief sees improvement on technology front

Reflecting on his final days director of the Office of Management and Budget, Mitch Daniels said the Bush administration's approach to managing information technology investments is succeeding.

Daniels told National Journal Group reporters in an interview last week that he is proud of how his office has managed technology and e-government programs.

In the past, Daniels, said, "government ... has done a horrible job of acquiring and using information technology. We're spending $58 billion this year, and a lot of it's not only misspent, it's counterproductively spent. That is to say, agencies are building systems that won't work even with the systems in their own agencies, let alone across the government."

To remedy that problem, OMB has relied on a federal law known as the Clinger-Cohen Act to ensure that the government is not misspending taxpayer dollars. He called that statute "an unusual tool" that allows the White House and executive branch "to put our big, hairy foot down in the path of any IT investment that doesn't meet certain tests."

"It hadn't been used until we got here," Daniels added. "But we've used it a lot. I hope my successors will use it continually to reshape IT investment so we get a more interoperable and effective system across the government."

At the behest of consumer rights advocate Ralph Nader and the Consumer Project on Technology, Daniels and other OMB officials have been contemplating a move that could force federal agencies to purchase common software, such as word processors and graphics-presentation programs, to adhere to open standards.

The move, according to the project's executive director, James Love, would boost competition for "open source" software whose code is open to inspection and alteration by users and lower prices for the government.

"I am very interested in the subject, but I don't pretend to know enough to know exactly what the right answers are on the open-source subject," Daniels said. He added, however that "government deserves a lot better deal than it's getting, all say this, from some of its major vendors."

Right now, OMB is discussing ways to get " better volume discounts and pricing" from software vendors. "Part of that might be to encourage wider competition, which I think takes you in the direction-maybe-of open source," he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.