Senate panel votes for Hill oversight of passenger-screening system

As defense and privacy experts prepared to debate the government's increased use of technologies to mine data for terrorist activity on Thursday, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., announced committee passage of his amendment to provide congressional oversight of an airline-passenger screening system.

"I think the debate has just begun," Wyden told the Forum on Technology and Innovation, referring to the increased attention in Congress to civil liberties matters related to surveillance technologies.

This is Wyden's second amendment on data mining this year. Last month he sponsored an amendment in the omnibus appropriations law for fiscal 2003; it requires a report within 90 days on the Total Information Awareness (TIA) program being studied by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and requires eventual congressional approval of any technology arising from the research project.

The amendment approved by the Senate Commerce Committee by voice vote on Thursday would require congressional oversight of the Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS II) being developed by the Transportation Security Administration. Mirroring his TIA amendment, it would require a report on the project within 90 days, this time from TSA's parent agency, the Homeland Security Department.

According to the amendment-approved as part of an air-cargo security bill (S. 165), the report on CAPPS II must address several issues. These include: how long collected data will be maintained and who will have access to it; how TSA will treat the data; what role airlines will play; what safeguards will be implemented to ensure only official use of the information; what efforts will be undertaken to mitigate errors and provide procedural recourse to passengers wrongly barred from a flight; and what oversight procedures will exist for civil liberties.

Wyden said in an interview afterward that he is "optimistic" about the prospects for the CAPPS II amendment because no member of Congress opposed his earlier TIA amendment. "I think the message here is that these issues are zooming up on the congressional radar," he said.

Wyden said Defense appears to be on track to deliver its report on TIA in May. He met with DARPA Director Tony Tether, who told Wyden that in hindsight that he would handle the TIA issue differently.

Defense insider Richard Perle, an American Enterprise Institute fellow, shared that view. "I regret there was not a fuller dialogue" between government officials and concerned parties, he said. "I think the Defense Department did the wrong thing in this case" by being unresponsive when the first questions arose about the project.

But he said the project could work because it would be held to the same surveillance standards as wiretapping, which requires a court order. The TIA technology would collect anonymous information, only revealing names when there is reason for suspicion, he said.

Jim Dempsey, executive director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, listed surveillance technologies being developed or in use by government and said civil liberties do not have to be jeopardized for them to work against terrorism. Dempsey said Congress "has an important role ... in insisting we get this right."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.