Pentagon seeks tech-savvy workers

Creating a larger pool of science- and engineering-savvy workers to choose from and developing nanotechnologies are the Defense Department's top science and technology priorities, a panel of senior department officials told a Senate subcommittee on Monday.

"Nanotechnology is going to revolutionize everything we do" in the military, Gen. Lester Lyles, commander of Air Force Materiel Command, told the Armed Services Emerging Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee.

The other witnesses were: Vice Adm. Joseph Dyer, commander of Naval Air Systems Command; Gen. Paul Kern, commander of Army Materiel Command; and Michael Wynne, principal deputy Defense undersecretary for acquisition, technology and logistics. At a House hearing on Thursday, other Defense officials gave testimony similar to that of all of the officials.

In Monday's Senate hearing, officials said the United States is in danger of losing its edge in military technology if it does not change course. Countries such as China and India have an abundant supply of talent and are making technology a priority, Kern said.

"We'll be challenged to keep up with them academically and from a security standpoint if we fall behind," said Kern, who said nanotechnology offers "bright potential," as does quantum theory.

Lyles ranked the training and education of American citizens as the top priority, followed by the continued development of cutting-edge technologies, including nanotechnology and biotechnology. "We shouldn't let that melt away," he said, adding that the different services are harmonizing their nanotech projects.

Dyer said the military still is able to attract top young talent but must focus on finding ways to keep them into their "peak performance" years by offering "exciting work to do." He called the workforce issue a "must-solve challenge."

"Simple demographics show that over the next 10 years, we will lose most of our current workforce," Dyer said.

Wynne added, "The decline in scientists and engineers becomes more acute when considering the production by academia of scientists and engineers who are American citizens."

The officials did not deny a projection raised by Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., that science and technology would comprise 2.4 percent of the total military budget by fiscal 2009, down from a proposed 2.7 percent in fiscal 2004. That projection runs contrary to a stated departmental goal of a science and technology budget of 3 percent of the total military budget.

Wynne said that costs are hard to project but indicated that other urgent priorities, such as health benefits, get in the way of science and tech investments. He also stressed the need for the military to have flexibility in how it spends money.

Lyles said the most significant change in the $2.2 billion Air Force budget for science and technology work in fiscal 2004 is $350 million in projects from the office of the secretary of Defense. That would include a high-performance computer modernization program, he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.