Surveying the Changing Landscape

By all accounts, it has been a landmark year for federal information technology (IT) managers. Besides dealing with computer industry trends such as business process reengineering and moving from mainframes to desktop machines, IT executives have grappled with issues raised by the National Performance Review, the Republican Revolution, government shutdowns, procurement reform and electronic commerce-not to mention a string of IT directives from the Office of Management and Budget and procurement legislation. For many federal executives, the events of 1996 will change forever the way information technology is acquired and implemented.

Throughout government, mainframe legacy systems are being replaced with modular, commercial, off-the-shelf, client-server systems. Likewise, gigantic, single-source procurements are being replaced with multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts. In addition, government buyers now can purchase professional IT services directly from General Services Administration schedules much as they would buy any equipment.

"The age of the single-source contract is gone," says Manny De Vera, director of the National Institutes of Health IT Acquisition and Assessment Center. De Vera's observation echoes the sentiments of many in government who see multiple-award IDIQs as the wave of the future. In a $100 million award last August, for example, NIH awarded the Chief Information Officer Solutions and Partners contract to a record 20 firms-all prime contractors.

Another multiple-award IDIQ contract, the Defense Information Systems Agency's DEIS II program, soon will start pumping $3 billion into six major defense contractors-BDM, Boeing, Computer Sciences Corp., Electronic Data Systems, Lockheed Martin and Unisys-along with a whopping 245 subcontractors. Boeing alone has lined up 48 subcontractors to help it pursue DEIS II work.

Thanks to the enactment of this year's Information Technology Management Reform Act (ITMRA), which repealed the 30-year-old Brooks Act, agencies have more flexibility when acquiring IT services. Both purchasing thresholds and GSA procurement oversight built into the Brooks Act were eliminated under the ITMRA.

In addition, the law did away with the GSA's Board of Contract Appeals and its special protest jurisdiction, much to the consternation of some government contractors. This was a thorny issue because the government wanted to make sure that proper contracting procedures were followed for every award. However, contractor protests were tying up procurements for months and even years. Under the ITMRA, protests now will be handled by the General Accounting Office and the federal courts.

The ITMRA also created the chief information officer post for federal agencies, a position that has been popular in private industry for years. To bolster the importance of the position, President Clinton signed an executive order creating a deputy CIO. These new positions are expected to make outsourcing easier for agencies, since more authority is being shifted to the IT shops.

The prospect of farming out information technology services has been raised by every administration since 1955. However, the government has lagged behind in the outsourcing movement for various reasons. First, there is no standard definition for outsourcing, and there are many variations of the practice, ranging from contracting partnerships to wholesale privatization.

Outsourcing also has many negative connotations, especially when offered up in its most extreme form: privatization. When some government workers hear the word outsourcing, they assume their organizations or their jobs will disappear. Consequently, the word "outsourcing" is often replaced with euphemisms such as "rightsizing" and "reinvention reegineering."

"There's always a groundswell of support for not outsourcing core functions," says Ken Johnson, chairman of the Industry Advisory Council and president of Cordant. "But the savings associated with IT outsourcing will make the strategy attractive to more government managers."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.