Retirement Planning Retirement PlanningRetirement Planning
Advice on how to prepare for life after government.

Making Sense of the Medicare Mess

Flickr user Adrian Clark

Making decisions about insurance coverage is a very important part of retirement planning. In particular, federal retirees have a lot of concerns about Medicare and their coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. Those questions are particularly important this time of year, with FEHBP open season just days away.

As members of the Baby Boom generation continue to retire in large numbers, many federal retirees — and even many active employees — are nearing age 65 and will need to think about adding Medicare to their health insurance coverage. How much will it cost and is it necessary?

One big question involves Medicare Part B, which helps cover the cost of doctors’ services and outpatient care. Many employees and retirees wonder they need to add Part B coverage, since most of them continue their FEHBP coverage into retirement.

That question is complicated by concerns about the premium increase for Part B in 2017. That is still a mystery as we wait for Congress to come back in session until after the election to find out whether legislators will take action to prevent looming increases from going into effect.

For the many federal retirees who do not have Medicare withheld from a Social Security benefit, what is now a $1,258-per-year question could turn into a $1,788-per-year question. The premium for 2017 could go as high as $149 per month, up from the $104.83 that most Medicare beneficiaries currently pay.  (The 3 million new beneficiaries who enrolled in 2016, along with those who are not protected by a provision that keeps the premium from increasing if there is no cost of living adjustment, pay $121.80 a month.)

This new premiums were announced earlier this year in the Medicare Trustees report. The trustees estimate that average Part B payments will need to increase 22 percent next year to to make up the difference between premiums collected and Part B costs. Some high-income folks could see premiums as high as $475 per month.

Earlier this year, the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association joined with 74 other organizations in urging Congress to take action to prevent the premium hikes from taking effect. In it, they decried the effects of the “hold harmless” provision in federal law, which protects Social Security recipients from higher Medicare premiums — but only if the Part B premium is being withheld from a Social Security benefit and the individual is not subject to the higher Medicare premiums for upper-income retirees.

In a letter to lawmakers, the groups said: “As it did in 2015, Congress should make it a priority to shield people with Medicare from the unintended consequences resulting from the application of the hold harmless provision. No beneficiary should be forced to pay more than they otherwise would simply because some beneficiaries are afforded critical protections against reductions in their Social Security checks. We urge Congress to act accordingly and swiftly following the announcement of the 2017 COLA.”

Last year, the news wasn’t as dire, because there was no cost of living increase for retirees, and the hold harmless provision prevailed for the majority of Medicare beneficiaries. This year, we’ll have to wait and see what Congress does in a lame-duck session.

The broader question, of course, is whether Part B is even necessary for federal employees. There is no simple answer, unfortunately. It seems that with Part B premiums on the rise (and health insurance in general becoming more expensive), the decision is coming down to dollars and cents. In next week’s column, I’ll take a closer look at some of the questions I’ve been getting recently about Part B. The answers may help you reach a decision about adding Part B to your future health coverage.

In the meantime, remember that almost all federal retirees (and employees) who are 65 or older qualify for the hospital part of Medicare, known as Part A. It is covered by the payroll tax and is only going to provide a benefit when a doctor admits you for an overnight stay in the hospital.

If you’re retired and your health insurance premium is being deducted from your retirement benefit, then Medicare would be the primary payer for your inpatient hospitalization and your FEHBP plan would be secondary. If you have your FEHBP premium deducted from your salary as a current employee, then Medicare would be secondary to the FEHBP plan.

Information about coordinating Medicare and FEHB can be found in Section 9 of every FEHBP plan brochure. You will be automatically enrolled in Medicare Part A if you are receiving a Social Security benefit at age 65. Otherwise, you can enroll online at the Social Security website.

Photo: Flickr user Adrian Clark

Tammy Flanagan has spent 30 years helping federal employees take charge of their retirement by understanding their benefits. She runs her own consulting business at and provides individual counseling as well as online training for the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, Plan Your Federal Retirement as well as the Federal Long Term Care insurance Program. She also serves as the senior benefits director for the National Institute of Transition Planning Inc., which conducts federal retirement planning workshops and seminars.

For more retirement planning help, tune in to "For Your Benefit," presented by the National Institute of Transition Planning Inc. live on Federal News Radio on Mondays at 10 a.m. ET on WFED AM 1500 in the Washington-metro area. Archived shows are available on

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.