Pay & Benefits Watch Pay & Benefits WatchPay & Benefits Watch
Key developments in the world of federal employee benefits: health, pay, and much more.

Eyes on the Prize


It's only July and already the House has passed a 3.1 percent pay raise for civil service workers in 2006, but does that mean employees will get their raises on time?

Not necessarily.

It's true that House members worked to get their measure, which was included in the 2006 Transportation-Treasury appropriations bill (H.R. 3058), passed before the July recess. For the last two years, the House didn't pass its bill until September.

In order for the pay raise to go through, though, a number of hurdles still must be jumped. The Senate also must pass a bill with a pay raise. Then members from each chamber will have to work out differences in the two versions of the bill. Once the committee reaches agreement, each chamber must pass a final version.

"All we can do on the House side is to pass our appropriations bill in a timely manner, which is what Chairman [Jerry Lewis, R-Calif.] got done this year," House Government Reform Committee spokesman Robert White said. "We're very happy with the 3.1 percent, and now we're waiting for the rest of the pieces to fall into place."

The target adjournment date Congress has set is Sept. 30, and the last possible moment that Congress and the president could finish their work on time is the end of the calendar year, Dec. 31. Then the pay increase could go directly into effect for the 2006 calendar year.

However, if a logjam in Congress prevents a timely finish to the effort, workers will receive part of their raise retroactively, which is what happened in 2003 and 2004, when workers received their extra pay at least three months or more late. For 2005, the raise went into effect on Jan. 9.

While Congress is on track to get that pay increase to workers on time, the recent retirement of Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor means the Senate will have to spend time confirming a court nominee. That duration can vary. While O'Connor's confirmation hearings lasted less than two weeks, the hearings of Justice Clarence Thomas went on for more than a month.

Members of Congress also have President Bush's Social Security reform agenda, as well as all other spending items, to deal with in that same period.

The Senate Appropriations Committee is scheduled to meet about their version of the 2006 Transportation-Treasury appropriations bill on Tuesday, according to committee spokeswoman Jenny Manley.

Once Congress finishes its work, the president has to sign the bill into law. President Bush objected to the raise, because it is higher than his proposed 2.3 percent pay increase. This may be where the trouble begins, according to American Federation of Government Employees President John Gage.

Getting the bill finished on time is "very important," Gage said. "[The Office of Management and Budget] has promised me they will [institute] pay parity this year, but I still think the administration is not finished. I don't think they're done."

In an added complication, there is a pay raise formula already established by law - the 1990 Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act. If the final pay raise differs from the number mandated by FEPCA, by law the president will need to issue a statement to reconcile the discrepancy.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.