Acting OPM Director Beth Cobert said the bill is "necessary to ensure that families of civil servants killed while serving the people of the United States do not take on an unnecessary financial burden."

Acting OPM Director Beth Cobert said the bill is "necessary to ensure that families of civil servants killed while serving the people of the United States do not take on an unnecessary financial burden." Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

OPM Wants to Boost Death Benefits For Feds By $90K

Payout for civilian employees killed on the job would increase from $10,000 to $100,000 if legislation is passed.

The Office of Personnel Management wants to significantly increase death benefits for federal civilian employees killed on the job from $10,000 to $100,000.

OPM on Friday sent a legislative proposal to the House and Senate requesting Congress to increase the current death gratuity rate $90,000 for civilian workers killed in the line of duty, raise the funeral allowance from $800 to $8,800 and ensure that both benefits automatically increase along with the Consumer Price Index. The death benefit amount hasn’t changed since 1997, which the funeral allowance for those killed on the job has remained the same since 1966.

The proposal would apply to federal workers killed in the line of duty as a result of a terrorist attack, crime, exposure to extreme risk while doing their jobs, or in retaliation for performing their duties.

The proposal seeks to “harmonize” death benefits across government, which can vary based on where the employee worked, beneficiaries, and the specific job.

“Currently, significant disparities and inequities exist across the federal government with respect to the administration of death gratuities,” said an OPM statement.

“Our commitment to caring for our federal employees and their families in the toughest of times is unwavering,” said OPM Acting Director Beth Cobert in a statement. “This legislation is necessary to ensure that families of civil servants killed while serving the people of the United States do not take on an unnecessary financial burden.”

NEXT STORY: Outlook Is Decent For a 2017 COLA