Improper Hiring at Treasury Bureau Possibly Affected Veterans

An audit of the Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network concluded the bureau used improper criteria when screening and hiring candidates for certain jobs. An audit of the Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network concluded the bureau used improper criteria when screening and hiring candidates for certain jobs. Bill Perry/

This story has been updated.

A White House nomination is on hold, and lawmakers are raising questions over possible violations of veterans’ preference because of a flap over improper hiring practices at the Treasury Department.

Two congressional Republicans are requesting more information from Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network over an audit this past winter that concluded the bureau used improper criteria when screening and hiring candidates for certain jobs. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, put a hold this week on the nomination of Nani Coloretti to be deputy secretary of the Housing and Urban Development Department to prod Treasury into turning over documents related to the inquiry. Coloretti is Treasury’s assistant secretary for management.

On the other side of the Capitol, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., is also demanding answers. At issue is a routine human capital audit conducted by the Office of Personnel Management in February at FinCEN that found employees had applied illegal hiring criteria for several job openings, violating the rules of competitive service hiring in the federal government. Treasury in March temporarily suspended the bureau’s hiring authority, and according to a May 2 Reuters report, withdrew 11 job offers as a result of the audit.

Treasury officials -- and now members of Congress -- are also looking into the possibility that veterans’ preference may have been illegally circumvented in the process. Military veterans are given preference over other eligible, non-veteran candidates for federal jobs in the competitive service. According to a May 9 Reuters report, FinCEN screened candidates in an effort to hire only lawyers for certain jobs, but did not advertise in the vacancy announcements that those positions required a law degree.

Federal hiring rules prohibit agencies from screening candidates for qualifications not included in the job posting.

“The fact that FinCEN allegedly rejected pools of candidates made up of qualified veterans who met the criteria listed in the initial job postings effectively amounts to discrimination,” Issa wrote in a June 2 letter to FinCEN Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery requesting documents related to the incident. “Yet, instead of offering the jobs to qualified veterans as required by law, FinCEN applied additional improper requirements to applicants, and then pulled the listings and re-posted the jobs with requirements typically held by lawyers with prosecutorial experience,” the letter said, citing the May 9 Reuters report.

FinCEN spokesman Steve Hudak said in statement that the agency "continues to recruit and hire excellent staff who are helping to safeguard the financial system and promote national security. We have no comment on other personnel issues."

In the May 9 Reuters report, Hudak told the news service that 25 percent of FinCEN’s new hires in 2013 were vets.

FinCEN’s mission is to prevent and combat money laundering.

(Image via Bill Perry/

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.