Justice IG: U.S Marshals Overused Overtime Pay

A U.S. Marshall gestures in April. A U.S. Marshall gestures in April. Michael Dwyer/AP

Some Washington-based U.S. Marshals may have excessively used overtime pay, according to a report from the Justice Department inspector general.

The IG’s report, released on Wednesday, audited the U.S. Marshals Service’s Office in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, and found discrepancies in the use of overtime pay from fiscal 2009 through fiscal 2011. The IG said the total overtime pay in the office amounted to approximately 160,000 overtime hours, costing nearly $6 million over three fiscal years.

But this number, said the IG, does “not convey an accurate picture of what some individual district employees actually received” in overtime pay.  The report said “five employees alone” received 11 percent of the total overtime, and one earned a greater amount of pay in overtime than in actual base salary.

“Furthermore, supervisors are not required to document their overtime need or otherwise justify the number of overtime shifts available,” the IG said.  “As a result, supervisors use different methods to assign overtime, and employees have accused supervisors in at least two instances of providing preferential treatment to some employees in comparison to others.”

The IG noted that the amount of overtime pay decreased from $2.7 million to $1.5 million in the years that the agency was audited. Still, supervisors at the USMS “primarily relied on their experience and intuition to determine” overtime shifts, according to the report.

Other areas of concern noted by the IG included the use of agency fleet and purchase cards.  The IG said the agency needed to “strengthen internal controls” after it could not support more than $51,000 in fleet card transactions, and $60,000 in purchase card transactions.

In response to the report, U.S. Marshals Service Associate Director for Administration Steven Mertens concurred with the recommendations, and said USMS would update key fiscal and accounting policies to ensure better management.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.