Postal Service steers attention away from 'flawed' revenue study

Paul Sakuma/AP

U.S. Postal Service officials say a research firm used a “seriously flawed” methodology in a study that concluded mail service cuts would cost USPS billions in revenue, but the agency would not reveal details of that methodology.

The Postal Service filed a request earlier this month to keep the revenue study’s results private, but Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine., obtained summary tables of the original report after a hearing with the Postal Regulatory Commission earlier this week.

The report, commissioned by USPS, estimated that service cuts included in the Postal Service’s business plan would result in $5.2 billion in lost revenue for the first year of implementation.

An outside firm conducted the market research survey, and asked USPS’ largest customers how the closures would affect business. USPS said the survey was flawed because it “asked respondents about a scenario that would never be implemented at the same time.”

For example, rather than asking the customer to respond individually to USPS’ plans for facilities closures, five-day delivery, and modifying first- and second-class mail procedures, the proposals were presented together.

The survey also asked “whether business customer respondents would lessen their use of the mail if the Postal Service immediately imposed price increases, service standard changes, altered delivery frequency, realigned its network of mail processing facilities and other actions,” USPS spokesman David Partenheimer said.

“Any such contemplated actions, if implemented, would be done so over a phased, five-year time horizon, providing adequate time for planning,” he said.

The Postal Service, however, will begin the process of shuttering or consolidating more than 223 processing centers this spring. Some closures will be suspended during the November elections, after state officials complained the process could disrupt the absentee and mail-in voting process.

USPS is instead emphasizing the savings and costs estimates from its five-year business plan over the new survey.

Officials expect that plan will reduce USPS’ annual costs by more than $22 billion by 2016. The strategy recommends enabling the agency to provide its own health benefits to employees -- independent of federal programs -- moving to a national five-day delivery schedule, modifying first-class mail and standard mail pricing to adjust for lower volume, and reducing the number of full-time USPS positions through attrition and retirements.

A staff member with Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., isn’t buying USPS’ argument.

“I think it’s pretty clear that the results started to come back and USPS didn’t like the results because they would be very inconvenient for them,” the staffer told Government Executive.

The staffer also noted the study’s timing: two key USPS reform bills should see action next week after being stalled in committee for months.

The Senate could vote on a motion to begin debate on the 21st Century Postal Service Act as early as Monday. That measure proposes prefunding retirement health benefits and allowing USPS to reduce mail delivery to five days if officials cannot come up with similar savings two years after enactment. It also would require the Office of Personnel Management to return a Federal Employees Retirement System surplus to USPS every year that one is calculated.

The motion to proceed with debate requires 60 votes. Emily Spain, a spokeswoman for Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del, a co-sponsor of the bill, said the motion is likely to pass.

The GOP-favored 2011 Postal Reform Act, which requires USPS to reduce mail delivery from six days a week to five, will move to the House Rules Committee next week, where lawmakers will vote on whether to allow some of the bill’s provisions to be expedited.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.