OMB employees split over labor representation

Professional employees at the Office of Management and Budget voted against forming a union Tuesday, while a smaller group of workers opted for representation, according to final results from the Federal Labor Relations Authority.

Those workers in the "professional" job category voted 101-59 against joining the American Federation of Government Employees. Staff in the "nonprofessional" category voted 11-1 to create a bargaining unit affiliated with the union. Of the agency's 389 professional and nonprofessional staff, the Federal Labor Relations Authority determined that 243 employees were eligible to vote on union representation. Eligible professional staff included program examiners, policy analysts and employees in the budget review division, while eligible nonprofessional staff included administrative and support personnel.

Professional employees also voted 97-63 against forming a combined bargaining unit with nonprofessional personnel which led to the separate overall vote.

Employees cast their ballots on Oct. 26 and Nov. 1. Last spring, nearly 400 civil service workers from OMB approached AFGE about union representation.

OMB Director Jack Lew, who called the agency "a jewel in the civil service," expressed support for employees. "As I've said throughout this process, the administration is deeply committed to the rights of workers to organize," Lew said in an email. "Thus, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the vote, I have been -- and remain -- committed to working with the entire OMB team to create an agency that meets our highest standards, serves the president and the American people, and is a welcoming and productive place to work."

The OMB union movement's informational website cited a desire to create a sustaining partnership with agency leadership and proactive labor-management forum as a reason for representation. "OMB staff need a voice and need to be at the table when issues are being discussed related to our work and work-life issues," the website stated. "For far too long, management has taken OMB staff for granted."

The website identifies fair compensation for extra work hours, flexible schedules and less staff turnover among the top reasons for labor representation.

OMB has been focusing on ways to strengthen the leadership and management infrastructure within the agency, Lew said. "We also are striving to bring more balance to OMB's workload by evaluating the work requirements and priorities across the institution and making adjustments as needed," he said. A senior OMB staffer has met with political and career managers in each office to discuss the survey results from the 2011 Federal Viewpoint Survey, in which OMB ranked 30 out of 37 agencies in the job satisfaction category.

Offices must submit plans for areas of improvement to Lew in December.

In a separate action, more than 1,400 Army civilian personnel workers at the consolidated Army Human Resources Command at Fort Knox, Ky., voted late last week to join AFGE. The employees provide human resources services to soldiers, veterans, retirees and Army families.

The employees were transferred to Fort Knox from other areas as part of the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure process, which recommended consolidating all of the Army's human resources functions at Fort Knox. Even though the employees already were represented by AFGE, the Federal Labor Relations Authority required a new election be held to determine if the transferred employees wanted to retain their union representation.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.