Lawmakers lambast OPM for jobs site glitches, slow retirement processing

None Pete Marovich/Newscom
Lawmakers took the Office of Personnel Management to task for glitches in its relaunched USAJobs website and for inadequate federal worker retirement claims processing, during a House oversight panel hearing on Tuesday.

During questioning from members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce, Director John Berry stood by OPM's decision to bring the redesign of the federal jobs board in-house rather than contract it out to

"Taxpayers are now paying for a system that doesn't work, costs more and takes money away from the private sector," Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla., chairman of the subcommittee, said in his opening statement.

Berry said security breaches of's servers in 2007 and 2009 spurred the in-house operation. Those incidents resulted in the theft of 146,000 federal employee resumes while the company was still running USAJobs 2.0, Berry said. With the operation in-house, the government can more closely monitor its employee information, he testified.

But Executive Vice President and Chief Privacy Officer Patrick Manzo stated that had taken steps to improve its security following the 2009 breach, and that he believed the company could do a better job operating USAJobs than OPM.

"Just because it is on a government computer system does not mean that it is safer than a commercial computer system," Manzo said.

Also of concern during the hearing was the pace at which OPM is processing federal worker retirement claims. Ross said OPM had a backlog of 60,000 retirement claims to be processed, with no business plan to bring claims procedures up to date. An OPM spokeswoman, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed the number.

As more federal agencies push to reduce payroll, there will soon be many more retirees, including up to 120,000 from the U.S. Postal Service and thousands more from NASA, the Government Accountability Office and the Defense Department. Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., ranking member of the subcommittee, warned that the upcoming wave of retirees combined with OPM's dwindling resources and already slow pace would create a "perfect storm" for the agency.

"This is a mess and it can't continue, and it looks like it's going to get worse," Lynch said.

The logjam in OPM retirement processing dates back to the 1980s. Since 1987, the agency has made four separate failed attempts to automate its retirement processing. Its most recent effort was launched in 2008 and terminated in February. GAO reported in 2008 that OPM lacked proper benchmarks for progress in addition to a long-term plan and an oversight body.

Valerie Melvin, information management and human capital issues director at GAO, testified Tuesday that OPM is more equipped to handle small-scale changes than wholesale ones. Melvin praised OPM for beginning to address GAO's 19 recommendations. "I would not want to imply that they have the full capability at this point to move forward," she added.

"We are not in control yet," Berry admitted, referring to OPM's lack of a business plan for tackling its retiree backlog and automating retirement accounts. But he said a plan is on the way "in the very near future" and the agency is restructuring its available resources to make retirement processing more efficient.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated the number of retirement claims OPM Director John Berry said his agency processes each day. OPM's press office could not confirm the actual number Wednesday.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.