Managers’ attitudes get in the way of disability hiring

Negative attitudes toward people with disabilities are a key barrier to meeting hiring goals, according to federal officials.

The government faces challenges in hiring and retaining disabled workers because of misperceptions about their capabilities, along with a lack of awareness about reasonable accommodations, witnesses told members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Oversight of Government Management Subcommittee during a hearing on Wednesday afternoon. Managers and employees must change their views of disabled workers, the witnesses said.

"Attitudinal barriers continue to be the biggest problem," Office of Personnel Management Deputy Director Christine Griffin said. "The only way to get rid of attitudinal barriers is to hire people with disabilities."

President Obama in July 2010 issued an executive order directing federal agencies to take steps to meet a goal of hiring an additional 100,000 disabled employees over five years. Agencies are required to develop plans for promoting employment opportunities for disabled individuals; increase their use of the Schedule A excepted service hiring authority for applicants with disabilities; and boost participation of people with disabilities in internships, fellowships, and training and mentoring programs.

In addition to hiring initiatives, the directive requires agencies to improve retention of disabled workers. Among strategies available to them, according to the order, are beefing up training, using agencywide pools of money to provide reasonable accommodations, increasing technology access, and ensuring the accessibility of physical and virtual workspaces.

Recruiting and retaining individuals with targeted disabilities -- deafness, blindness, missing extremities, partial or complete paralysis, convulsive disorders, mental retardation, mental illness, and distortion of the limbs and/or spine - are particular challenges, witness said. According to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission data, the portion of federal workers with targeted disabilities decreased 9.43 percent from fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2009, and just 0.88 percent of current government employees have targeted disabilities.

Agency leaders should know there are repercussions if they don't reach disability hiring targets, EEOC Commissioner Chai Feldblum said. They also have to understand how meeting the directive's goals fits their strategic mission. It's "not rocket science," she added.

According to Griffin, agencies are engaged in disability hiring issues because they are being held accountable for their success. "We for a long time have been trying to get agencies to do this," she said. "The difference right now is we have their attention."

OPM is working on veterans' hiring initiatives, promoting telework for disabled employees and presenting a series of training sessions with EEOC to help agencies comply with the executive order, Griffin said.

Managers also struggle to approve and provide accommodations that would help disabled employees perform their jobs, witnesses agreed.

"There are lots of cases filed when disabled employees aren't given [reasonable] accommodation," Griffin said. "Many are because the manager thinks their budget will have to cover it. We need to take that decision away from the local manager so they're not thinking about whether an employee deserves it or whether they can afford it."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.