Burning Question: Should federal employees take a pay cut?
- March 2, 2010
- Comments
Today on Forbes.com, columnists Brian S. Wesbury and Robert Stein up the ante, arguing that not only should civilian federal workers forego a pay increase this year, they should take a 10 percent across the board reduction in salary.
The writers acknowledge the move "would not save a great deal of money" -- about $15 billion a year. And even the estimated future savings of lowering the government's payroll, they note, are "a drop in the bucket when compared with the total of all of the federal government's unfunded liabilities."
Still, Wesbury and Stein argue -- as have so many before them -- that it's the symbolism that counts.
Cut Pay for Government Workers
(Forbes.com)
Burning Question is a recurring feature that looks at key issues and compelling stories being explored at other publications and social media sites covering the federal government.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
New Digital Strategy: Mobile, Mobile, Mobile
Labor Dept. Parking Fees Rile Union
Neely Out at GSA
$100 Million to Dead Retirees?
The Lowdown on GSA Bonuses
Gimme My Discount! Deals for Feds
