Defense releases guidelines for NSPS transition

The Defense Department has released guidelines on how to assign new employees to pay systems as agencies transition out of the National Security Personnel System. But some employee groups are concerned that the Pentagon is wasting resources by continuing to place new hires into NSPS.

"NSPS organizations should begin appointing individuals to non-NSPS statutory pay systems," Tim Curry, the acting program executive officer for NSPS, wrote in a Dec. 10 memo to managers in the alternative pay system.

Any vacancies for positions within NSPS posted before March 1, 2010, must include a disclaimer explaining that the job will return to the General Schedule "or an applicable personnel system" by Jan. 1, 2012, the deadline by which NSPS must be repealed completely. After that date, any listings for new jobs must reflect either a General Schedule pay grade or a pay grade in one of Defense's other alternative pay systems.

NSPS does not have to be dismantled fully by 2010. But after March 1, 2010, new hires and employees moving to new positions at agencies where NSPS was implemented and has not yet been rolled back, must be paid according to the General Schedule pay scale or a remaining alternative pay system, even if some workers at those agencies are still being paid and evaluated under NSPS pending the transition.

But Bud Taylor, an official with National Federation of Federal Employees Local 1164, which represents a wide range of workers in the Army Corps of Engineers, Navy and Defense offices in New England, says that continuing to hire employees and categorizing them under NSPS when the system is due to end is counterintuitive and creates more work for hiring managers. He said members of the bargaining units his local chapter represents have seen multiple job listings with NSPS pay grades since President Obama signed legislation on Oct. 28 ending the pay system.

"That's waste, fraud and abuse," Taylor said. "From a purely pedestrian viewpoint, why are you going to do something you don't need to do? You need manpower to hire people under this, teach them about it, rate them under this, and then convert them [to the General Schedule system]."

Taylor said NFFE is working with Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Rep. Niki Tsongas, D-Mass., to determine why Defense is continuing to allow agencies to hire employees under NSPS until March.

Matt Biggs, legislative director for the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, said his union has filed unfair labor practice complaints against the Corps of Engineers for hiring workers into NSPS positions, rather than designating them as General Schedule employees, which would allow them to join a union. He said his union would remain vigilant until it was clear that NSPS rollback policies were being enforced uniformly across the Pentagon.

"While we remain hopeful that this good faith effort by DoD at the national level actually reverses the rogue actions of management at places like the Army Corps," Biggs said, "we will keep fighting."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.