Insurance providers drop out of federal employee health program

Some federal employees will have to choose new health plans during open season this year because their insurance providers are leaving the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program, or reducing the number of areas they cover.

"Some employees still might not receive instructions to change plans during open season," Kathleen M. McGettigan, deputy associate director of the Center for Retirement and Insurance Services at the Office of Personnel Management, wrote in a Sept. 29 letter to agency benefits administrators. "We encourage you to be liberal in accepting belated open season changes from employees enrolled in terminating plans or plans with service-area reductions and terminating enrollment codes."

Fourteen plans are leaving FEHBP altogether: PacifiCare of Arizona, PacifiCare of Colorado, ConnectiCare's plans in Connecticut and Massachusetts, United Healthcare of Florida, JMH Health Plan, PersonalCare Insurance of Illinois, Group Health Plan of Illinois and Missouri, PacifiCare of Oklahoma, United Health Care of Ohio, Paramount Health Care in Ohio, Keystone Health Plan Central and Keystone Health Plan East.

Eighteen plans are lowering coverage in certain areas: In California, Blue Shield of California Access+HMO will no longer cover employees in Northern California, though it will continue coverage in Tulare County. In Colorado, Humana CoverageFirst is dropping Colorado Springs and Denver. Coventry Health Care will no longer cover federal employees in Delaware. Florida's Humana CoverageFirst is dropping patients in Daytona, Pensacola and Fort Walton. In Indiana, Aetna Open Access is pulling out of Southeastern Indiana, and Humana CoverageFirst is leaving Eastern Indiana. UnitedHealthcare of Midwest Inc. plans to stop covering patients in Kansas City in Kansas and Missouri. In Kentucky, Aetna Open Access and Humana CoverageFirst both are pulling out of the northern part of the state, and in Ohio, Aetna Open Access is ending coverage for federal employees who live near Columbus and Greater Cincinnati, while Humana CoverageFirst is leaving Cincinnati and Dayton. Aetna Open Access also is leaving the Las Vegas and Reno areas. Coventry Health Care is stopping coverage in Southern New Jersey. In Oklahoma, Aetna Open Access will no longer cover workers in Oklahoma City and Tulsa. The plan also will leave Nashville, Tenn., and Houston. FirstCare is pulling out of Central Texas.

Some health plans are shrinking their coverage areas, but not closing the codes under which employees can enroll. Federal employees who don't switch out of those plans will retain their coverage, but will have to travel to areas where their providers still are offering coverage to receive treatment. The plans that are both reducing coverage and eliminating the FEHBP codes for those areas no longer will continue to provide coverage to federal employees, and those employees will have to switch to new plans.

Four companies are eliminating their high-deductible health plans: Group Health Plan in Illinois and Missouri, CDPDP Universal Benefits in New York, Paramount Health Care in Ohio, and Coventry Health Care is moving its high-deductible health plan out of Delaware and New Jersey.

OPM has provided agencies with a full list of changes to FEHBP health plans. Health care providers that are lowering coverage or dropping areas entirely are responsible for informing enrollees of those changes, McGettigan said, but agencies should follow up with employees anyway, in case insurers miss workers due to changes in contact information.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.