SEC scales back pay-for-performance ambitions

The Securities and Exchange Commission is moving more cautiously before using employees' performance reviews as a basis for pay decisions, the agency's executive director said Tuesday.

Diego Ruiz told a House subcommittee that the SEC is putting a fresh face on its controversial personnel system, and vowed to implement a completely new performance management system as a first step.

"This will allow the commission to focus all of its efforts on effectively implementing all aspects of the new system before relying on it to provide performance information to support pay decisions," he testified.

In the meantime, Ruiz said, employees receiving an "acceptable" performance rating will receive an equivalent share of the funds the agency has available for merit pay increases.

The new performance management system at SEC was developed using best practices from other federal agencies and the private sector. It also addresses several performance-related recommendations from the Government Accountability Office, the Office of Personnel Management and the SEC's inspector general, Ruiz said.

Still, to ensure SEC is improving performance management, he added, the inspector general will perform another full audit of the program in two years.

"This is a welcome decision by the agency," said Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union. "It has been clear for some time that the SEC system, as it has been designed and implemented, needs to be significantly revamped so that it is fair, credible and transparent."

In September, an arbitrator ruled that the SEC's pay-for-performance system was illegal because it resulted in discrimination against African-Americans and employees who are 40 and older. The grievance, filed by NTEU, covered the 2003 performance period; grievances are pending for every year since then.

The arbitrator did not rule on an appropriate remedy for the discrimination, but asked the SEC and NTEU to submit briefs on how to resolve the issue. On Tuesday, Ruiz said SEC proposed that, for all employees in the two affected categories, the agency would individually reconsider the merit pay awards for 2003, with retroactive pay adjustments for employees who received upgraded awards.

"NTEU would be provided a summary of the pay adjustments," he said, "and individual employees who remain dissatisfied would be permitted to file grievances in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement."

SEC's decision to scale back its personnel plans follows similar efforts at other agencies over the past year. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, for instance, recently agreed to suspend a system that garnered little buy-in from employees. And last February, officials at the Homeland Security Department pledged to scale back the agency's pay-for-performance ambitions after determining that a new pay system was a great source of anxiety to employees.

A lack of clearly defined work and performance expectations is one of the most widespread and serious problems with alternative pay systems, including the one at SEC, Kelley said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.