House votes to freeze locality pay areas until 2005

Congress approved legislation Thursday that ensures federal employees in Monterey County, Calif., will retain their special locality pay through 2004 no matter what decision the Federal Salary Council makes in October.

Under a "sense of Congress" amendment offered by Rep. Sam Farr, D-Calif., to the fiscal 2004 Transportation-Treasury appropriations bill, the Federal Salary Council would be prohibited from eliminating any special locality pay areas until 2005.

"My amendment essentially states that Congress believes current locality pay areas should be held harmless over the next year," Farr said on the House floor Thursday. "We ask that [the Office of Personnel Management] not eliminate any current locality pay area, but we do not object to OPM adding any new areas."

The government established the locality pay system under the 1990 Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act. Federal workers in 31 metropolitan areas, including Atlanta, Washington and San Francisco, receive special locality pay, based on the cost of labor in each city. Outside the 31 areas, federal workers in the 48 contiguous states are covered by the "Rest of the U.S." locality pay category. Each year the Federal Salary Council, a panel of government officials and federal union leaders, makes a recommendation on locality pay areas to the President's Pay Agent, a group that includes OPM Director Kay Coles James, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao and Office of Management and Budget Director Joshua Bolten. The Pay Agent then makes a recommendation to the president.

This year, the group decided to hold off on making changes to locality pay areas because OMB was revising its metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) and consolidated metropolitan statistical areas, which are defined using population, population density and commuting information. In the past, locality pay areas have been developed using MSAs. In 1999, Monterey County, Calif., was added to the San Francisco locality pay area, but the redrawn MSA lines may lead to the loss of special locality pay for the county, affecting the salaries of more than 4,000 federal employees. According to Farr, who testified before the Federal Salary Council on Wednesday, the cost-of-living in Monterey County is as high as that of San Francisco and San Jose and the elimination of locality pay could send federal employees packing.

"If Monterey federal agencies are going to have any hope of recruiting and retaining qualified and talented people in the federal workforce, maintaining the highest possible locality pay we can is imperative," one Monterey County federal employee wrote in an Aug. 27 letter to the council.

A working group within the council is expected to make recommendations to the full council in the next few weeks. The council's options include adopting the new MSAs, sticking with the old MSAs or developing its own locality pay areas. The council is expected to make a decision on the matter when it meets again on Oct. 7.

Farr said his amendment would give the council time to "do the research right and to draw up a fair and defensible plan for locality pay boundary designations."

"I will do everything in my power to ensure federal employees in Monterey County do not see a decrease in their paycheck," Farr said. "The issue is too complex and too sensitive to figure out in a month. Thousands of federal employee paychecks and, consequently federal agency missions, hang in the balance."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.