Lawmaker offers to broker deal with OMB on SEC pay raises
- By Pamela Barnett
- April 17, 2002
- Comments
At a hearing, Wolf told SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt he could arrange for "you and the OMB to meet with us," on the subject of pay parity--which Pitt called his top budget priority.
Pitt said he welcomed any assistance the committee could provide.
One third of the agency's staff have left in recent years for better paying jobs with other federal regulators, self-regulatory organizations overseen by the SEC, or private sector jobs, Pitt said. "At this critical time for the nation's financial markets, the SEC must be able to keep our most experienced … and talented employees," he added.
While saying he was sympathetic to the Bush administration's desire to avoid deficit spending, Wolf said he "strongly" supports pay parity for SEC professionals. At the same time, however, Wolf also noted that the excitement and fulfillment of public service had to be weighed against the lower pay.
"The SEC is not an agency of boredom or irrelevancy," Wolf said. "My sense is, if you are not there for the dollar, you can make up [for it] in some respects."
Nevertheless, Wolf said he was perplexed that the administration agreed to fund partial SEC pay parity for the remainder of this year, but had failed to budget for the raises in fiscal 2003. Pitt estimates it will cost an additional $76 million to fully fund pay parity for the agency next year.
Pitt emphasized, however, that he understood the need for his agency to try to conform to national priorities. Pitt also said he was "very grateful" for the administration's supplemental fiscal 2002 budget request of $20 million to allow the SEC to immediately hire 100 new professionals to deal with fallout from Enron Corp.'s collapse, including 35 new accountants and lawyers for the agency's enforcement division.
In the long term, however, "My impression is that 100 is not going to prove sufficient," Pitt said.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Older Feds Aren't Playing to Their Strengths
Is It Too Hard to Fire Misbehaving Feds?
Americans Still Like the Postal Service
A Forced 4-Day Weekend for Many Feds
No More Tax-Cheating Feds, Senators Say
Video: The Daily Show on Apple's Taxes
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Research Report: Powering Continuous Monitoring Through Big Data
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
