Supreme Court rules judges don’t have to pay Social Security

Federal judges appointed before 1983 don't have to pay Social Security taxes, the Supreme Court ruled Monday. In 1983, Congress passed a law requiring all newly hired federal employees to participate in Social Security. The law also allowed 96 percent of then-currently employed federal employees to begin participating in Social Security, but did not require them to. The remaining four percent of the federal workforce, which consisted of the President and other high-level government officials as well as all federal judges, were required to participate in Social Security unless they already contributed to certain retirement programs.

Those in such programs could modify their contributions such that their total payroll deduction for retirement and Social Security remained unchanged. This allowed them to join Social Security without incurring additional financial obligations. But federal judges' pension system was not among such programs. As a result, judges' payroll deductions had to increase. A group of federal judges appointed before 1983 said the law violated Article III, section 1 of the Constitution, commonly known as the "compensation clause." The compensation clause guarantees that federal judges' compensation will not be diminished while they are in office. On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that the compensation clause prevents the government from collecting Social Security taxes from federal judges who held office before Congress extended those taxes to federal employees.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.