Proposed cut in contraceptive coverage may not affect feds

The Bush administration's proposal to end a requirement that health insurance firms offer birth control coverage to federal employees probably won't have a significant impact, federal officials say. In President Bush's 2002 budget released Monday, he proposed scrapping a law that requires insurance coverage for a broad range of contraceptives for employees under federal health plans, including the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan. The law currently covers 1.2 million female federal employees of reproductive age. But an Office of Personnel Management official said Thursday that since covering the costs of contraceptives does not significantly affect insurance providers' bottom line, most providers will likely continue to offer employees a broad range of contraceptive options, in order to remain competitive in the market. A provision of the 1998 Treasury-Postal appropriations bill required all federal employee health plans to pay for five types of birth control approved by the Food and Drug Administration, including: the pill, Norplant, Depo-Provera, the intrauterine device (IUD), and the diaphragm. Prior to 1998, most providers covered only one form of birth control. Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., said that before the legislation was passed, many insurance carriers were not covering birth control costs at all, or only covered one form of contraception. He said having only one option is not enough. "Many women can't use certain types of contraceptives, based on their medical situations. Women need a broader choice when it comes to birth control," Moran said. Moran said he feared insurance carriers would go back to covering only one form of birth control without the 1998 legislation. "I think Congress is going to fight this proposal. The inequity of some plans covering Viagra and not contraceptives is just discriminatory," said Moran.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.