Budget hints at cost-cutting measures for federal health plans

The Bush administration's fiscal 2002 budget blueprint hints at changes in store for the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) to reduce federal employees' health care costs and improve their quality of care. Bush's blueprint said the administration will look at "incentives to federal employees and annuitants to choose their plans wisely." FEHBP provides coverage for some 9 million federal employees, retirees and their families. Premiums rose an average of 10.5 percent in 2001, 9.3 percent in 2000, and 9.5 percent in 1999. "I would interpret this as encouraging consumers to be more responsible consumers, providing ways for them to shop wisely and consider what their needs are," a spokesman for the House Civil Service Subcommittee said. Abby Block, associate director of insurance programs at OPM, said one of the incentives the Bush administration will consider is differential premium contributions, a practice used widely in the private sector.

Under differential premium contributions, the government would contribute a different amount toward the health plan's premium based on a rating system that would rate the plan on quality and efficiency. The higher the plan is rated, the more the government will contribute to the premium. "It's something that a number of employers have been doing for some time that we don't have the statutory authority to do--it would require Congress' approval," Block said. The move to differential premiums would improve quality while controlling costs, Block said. "Our firm belief is that they're one and the same thing--high-quality plans are also cost-efficient. If there is an incentive in the government's contribution, that is presumably an incentive for plans to become more efficient." In addition to differential premiums, OPM is looking at ways to contract with higher quality health plans by judging plans on standard quality measures. "We're not talking about reducing choice or the number of plans in the program--we're talking about raising the bar and hoping all plans will try to meet that," Block said. Asking plans to obtain accreditation from an independent organization is a part of the plan. "We will strengthen that in our letter [to the insurance companies] this year in terms of being more specific about our expectations," Block said. Removing the cap on the amount of money the government will contribute to a health plan's premium, known as the contribution cap, is not being looked at, Block said. Nevertheless, "how that would work in terms of a differential premium contribution is something that would have to be considered. They tie together," she said. Currently, the government never pays more than 75 percent of a plan's premium. The government's average contribution is a little less than 72 percent. Medical savings accounts are also not being considered, Block said. The Bush administration has not yet appointed a director of OPM. Until that happens, it's too early to say what kind of legislative proposal OPM will prepare for improving FEHBP. "A lot of this will get firmed up with some time. These are ideas that are on the table that the administration has looked at. But we will wait until we have some stronger direction in terms of how we want to proceed," Block said. OPM's letters to insurance companies go out at the end of March and health care plan's proposals are due by May 31. The agency won't have an idea of how much premiums will increase in 2002 until early June.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.