On Politics On PoliticsOn Politics
Analysis and perspective about what's happening in the political realm.

The Home Front

ARCHIVES

Last week's confirmation that the gross domestic product grew only 1.8 percent in the first quarter came when economists were already busily revising their growth forecasts downward for the rest of this year. A double-dip recession remains unlikely, but this is the weakest recovery since the Great Depression and the first one not being led by housing. The nearly moribund housing sector is, in fact, weighing down the recovery.

The conundrum is very real. On the one hand, the subprime-mortgage crisis and easy money -- loans with minimal down payments and scant documentation -- brought the U.S. economy to its knees just three years ago. Clearly, changes had to be made to prevent that from recurring. On the other hand, housing-industry leaders now fear that the pendulum is swinging too far the other way, potentially decimating an already battered sector and further stifling the anemic recovery. Although we hear the perennial debate over limiting the homeowners' mortgage-interest deduction, which would hurt the middle and higher end of the housing market, other proposed regulations really terrify the industry. These rules include increased down-payment requirements and loan restrictions for all but those with near-bulletproof credit ratings.

A bipartisan national poll of 2,000 likely voters by the National Association of Home Builders makes clear the unique position that homeownership holds in Americans' minds and the delicacy required in dealing with the issue.

The May 3-9 telephone survey, conducted by Celinda Lake and Jonathan Voss of the Democratic polling firm Lake Research Partners and by Neil Newhouse and Robert Blizzard of the GOP outfit Public Opinion Strategies, found that 75 percent of voters believe "that owning a home is the best long-term investment they can make and is worth the risk of ups and downs in the housing market."

Interestingly, a high percentage of people in different financial situations felt this way, including 81 percent of those who own their homes outright, 76 percent with mortgages, 67 percent who are renters, and 65 percent with underwater mortgages. Respondents were also asked whether they would recommend buying a house to a close friend or family member just starting out. Eighty percent of all voters said yes, including 78 percent who had underwater mortgages. Seventy-three percent of the respondents who do not own a home said that their goal is to eventually buy one. Clearly, the decline in home values and economic turmoil have not diluted their dream of homeownership and the aspirational element that makes the notion a core value.

Some have suggested that the government end tax incentives for homeowners, but the survey suggests a hostile voter reaction to that plan. Told that "since the federal income tax was introduced in 1913, the federal government has used the tax code to encourage home­ownership," respondents were then asked: "In general, do you think it is appropriate and reasonable for the federal government to provide tax incentives to promote homeownership, or do you think it is not a good idea?" Seventy-three percent of all voters thought those incentives should be provided, including 71 percent of Republicans, 68 percent of independents, 79 percent of Democrats, and even 68 percent of those who support the tea party movement.

When asked about requiring a 20 percent down payment to purchase a home, respondents split evenly, with 49 percent supporting such a threshold and 49 percent opposing it. But among those most likely to be affected, mortgage holders and renters ages 18 to 54, opposition was strong, with 58 percent of younger mortgage holders and 59 percent of younger renters opposed to adding that hurdle to buying a home.

Given this kind of visceral connection to homeownership, it's not surprising that 71 percent of respondents oppose eliminating the mortgage-interest deduction and 63 percent oppose lowering it. Moreover, 58 percent oppose eliminating the deduction for home-equity loans or limiting the deduction for those who earn more than $250,000 a year. Fifty-seven percent of voters said they would be less likely to support a candidate for Congress who wanted to eliminate the mortgage-interest deduction; only 26 percent said they would be more likely to support such a candidate.

These numbers are pretty much across the board: Sixty-three percent of Republicans, 56 percent of independents, 55 percent of Democrats, 61 percent of tea party supporters, and 58 percent of those voters in congressional districts held by freshman Republicans would be less likely to support a candidate who favored killing the deduction. With the unusually large sample, the pollsters segmented respondents who live in congressional districts that The Cook Political Report rates in the swing category. Fifty-eight percent of that group were less likely to support such a candidate, with 56 percent of those voters in swing Senate states and 54 percent in states that The Washington Post's Chris Cillizza rates as swing presidential states.

The clear message is that owning a home is among the values that Americans most cherish -- an important part of the American Dream.

 
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.