On Politics On PoliticsOn Politics
Analysis and perspective about what's happening in the political realm.

The Intensity Factor

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I feel compelled to report the latest signs that Republicans ought to be very worried about this fall's congressional elections.

A Gallup Poll this week showed President Bush with a job-approval rating of just 36 percent -- tying his previous low -- and a disapproval rating of 59 percent. A new Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg News poll was only slightly better for the president -- 39 percent approval, 57 percent disapproval.

The new Gallup Poll pegged the approval rating of the Republican-controlled Congress at a dismal 23 percent, down 4 points from a month ago. Seventy percent of respondents told Gallup they disapprove of Congress's performance. And in the Gallup variation on the right direction/wrong track question, just 27 percent of Americans said they are satisfied with the direction of the country; 71 percent are dissatisfied.

But most of the talk in political circles over the past week has been about the intensity of opposition to Bush. What sparked this chatter was a front-page Washington Post story exploring Republican strategists' worries about voter turnout -- concerns linked to Bush's ratings.

That article pointed to the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, which indicated that 47 percent of voters "strongly disapprove" of Bush's job performance while only 20 percent "strongly approve."

The story went on to say, "In the recent past, this perennial truism of politics -- emotion equals turnout -- has worked more to the Republican advantage. Several weeks before the 2002 midterm elections, Bush had 42 percent of voters strongly approving of him, compared with 18 percent in strong opposition. Democrats were stunned on Election Night when Republicans defied historical patterns and made gains in the House and Senate."

Other polls also show that intense opposition to Bush now very much outweighs intense support. An Associated Press/Ipsos Public Affairs poll taken early this month found that 42 percent of adults strongly disapproved of the president and only 18 percent strongly approved. A Cook Political Report/RT Strategies poll produced much the same result just days later -- 43 percent strongly disapproved; 18 percent strongly approved. Likewise, a March survey by the Democratic firm Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research: 45 percent of registered voters strongly disapproved, and 23 percent strongly approved.

After I noted this "upside down" intensity problem in a recent column, a reader asked whether there is any meaningful relationship between presidential approval ratings and midterm election voting.

Well, yes, a significant connection does exist between a president's standing with the public and the outcome of midterm balloting.

Emory University political scientist Alan Abramowitz discovered a remarkable pattern when he examined midterm data from 1982 to 2002 collected by the National Election Study: 72 percent of voters who strongly approved of the performance of a president voted for the president's party in the midterm election, but only 49 percent of those who weakly approved of a president's performance voted for his party's congressional candidates.

Among those who weakly disapproved of a president, 70 percent voted in the midterm for a candidate of the opposing party; a whopping 85 percent of those who strongly disapproved of a president voted for the opposing party.

These findings indicate that disapproval of a president is a much stronger driver of voters' midterm election decisions than approval is. And intensity -- whether intense approval or intense disapproval -- matters a great deal.

With more than 40 percent of voters strongly disapproving of Bush's performance, Democrats have quite a good chance of scoring a net gain of two to five Senate seats. The six-seat gain needed to take control still seems a bit out of reach. But in the House, while the odds of a takeover might not yet be 50-50, the trend line surely seems headed that way. Will anything stop the GOP's downhill slide?

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.