On Politics On PoliticsOn Politics
Analysis and perspective about what's happening in the political realm.

The Finish Line

With last month's conclusion of two House runoff elections in Louisiana, the 2004 campaign was officially over, with Republicans having picked up a net gain of three seats in the House for a 232-203 majority, counting independent Rep. Bernard Sanders of Vermont as a Democrat.

Before the Nov. 2 general election, the expectations were that there would be little change in the House, that either side might pick up one to three seats, and that Republicans were seen as more likely to gain than lose seats. The lack of competitive races in the House limited the ability of either party to score significant gains in the absence of some kind of tidal wave movement.

The National Republican Congressional Committee was successful in raising and spending more money than its counterpart, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

The most recent FEC filing showed that the NRCC outraised the DCCC for the cycle by $175 million to $91 million. According to the Campaign Finance Institute, the NRCC spent $48.2 million to $34.2 million for the DCCC in the period between Sept. 1 and Oct. 28.

This spending gap most certainly helped Republican Rep.-elect Dave Reichert prevail over Democrat Dave Ross in the pricey Seattle market in Washington's 8th District. Despite the influence of 527 groups in the presidential election, there was very little outside money spent in House races. A notable exception was the League of Conservation Voters, which spent heavily in the open Colorado 3rd District race, helping Democratic Rep.-elect John Salazar win the seat.

Most important, predictions of a polarized and partisan electorate that would oust candidates who were sitting in the "wrong" districts just never materialized.

Perennial Democratic targets in "red" states -- members such as Reps. Jim Matheson of Utah, Dennis Moore of Kansas and Earl Pomeroy of North Dakota -- actually saw their margins improve from 2002.

In Connecticut, GOP Rep. Rob Simmons outperformed President Bush significantly in his very "blue" 2nd District.

It will be interesting to see if Rep. Anne Northup, R-Ky., a long standing Democratic target, will remain in the crosshairs after her impressive 60 percent showing this year. Before this election, Northup had never taken more than 53 percent.

Defeated Indiana Rep. Baron Hill, the only Democratic incumbent outside of Texas to lose re-election, was sitting in a "red" seat. But, insiders blame Hill's loss less on a partisan wave and more on his voting record.

He had cast votes on social issues such as gay marriage and abortion rights that were easy to portray as out of step with this culturally conservative district. Some Democratic insiders also argue that Hill waited too long to hit back after Republicans launched negative attacks on him.

In Louisiana's two runoffs, the parties merely traded seats. In the 7th District, currently held by Democratic Rep. Chris John, who ran unsuccessfully for Senate, Republican cardiac surgeon Charles Boustany beat Democratic state Sen. Willie Mount, 55 percent to 45 percent.

By the end, there wasn't too much doubt in the outcome, though Mount was impressive as a mayor of Lake Charles and made many fans in the state Legislature.

Even Democrats conceded that her campaign was a mess, particularly the advertising. One significant problem was the decision of the Louisiana state Democratic Party to pay for part of the costs of a sample primary ballot to be distributed to voters in the district that endorsed Mount at the expense of state Sen. Don Cravins, a prominent black candidate in the race.

The black community was up in arms over the state party taking sides. And this, combined with inadequacies in Mount's campaign, created an uphill fight for Democrats. Conversely, Boustany was both an impressive candidate and had a top-flight campaign that took advantage of the situation to its fullest.

Mount even lost areas of the district that Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., carried in last month's presidential campaign. Parishes that had never voted for a Republican congressional candidate went GOP this time.

In the 3rd District, Billy Tauzin III got a great deal of attention, particularly in Washington, in the contest to replace his father, retiring GOP Rep. W.J. (Billy) Tauzin, a former chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

But the younger Tauzin was an unimpressive candidate with a campaign that was not fated to win any awards at all.

The line "Little Billy" stuck to the 31-year-old candidate like tar paper, costing him the district that President Bush carried just last month.

The winner, former state Rep. Charlie Melancon, a former president of the American Sugar Cane League, ran an aggressive campaign and effectively positioned himself as the adult in the race.

Even with that, the contest was close, with Melancon winning by only 517 votes, 50.2 percent to 49.8 percent.

Don't be surprised to see both Louisiana freshmen seriously challenged the next election cycle.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.