On Politics On PoliticsOn Politics
Analysis and perspective about what's happening in the political realm.

Tie Game

For perhaps the first time in this general election campaign, the presidential race is essentially even. While this has always been a competitive race, one candidate or the other has generally had an edge, even if just by a couple of points.

If someone put a gun to my head today and asked me to name this contest's winner, I might have to say, "Fire away," because I honestly don't know. Ten days ago, I would have said, "The race is close, but President Bush has the advantage." Six weeks ago, I would have said, "It's close, but John Kerry has an edge."

The national polls now range from showing Bush up by 7 points to showing Kerry up by 2. The average is a Bush lead of about 2 points. But over the past month or so, Bush has been drawing about 2 points less support in battleground states than in the nation as a whole, moving the contest back to square one.

The movement in the polls seems to be mainly among women. Before the first debate, Kerry had been underperforming among women, and some observers had attributed that fact to heightened concerns about terrorism among "security moms," particularly after the horrific scenes from the school siege in Russia. Other observers contended that Kerry's problem was that a good many women who normally vote Democratic just didn't like Kerry or his wife.

Whatever the reason, Kerry's first debate performance seems to have largely fixed his problem with women voters. And the first debate seemed to have helped Kerry a bit among some men as well.

Nothing in the vice presidential debate seems to have significantly changed the equation. Each running mate was more articulate than his partner had been. The differences between the two sides were sharpened, but the race stayed effectively frozen until the second presidential debate.

This race's tightness is evident not just in results of the national and collective battleground state polls but also in how closely divided the Electoral College appears to be.

Let's assume that Bush starts off with a base of 24 states with 208 electoral votes: Alabama (9), Alaska (3), Arizona (10), Arkansas (6), Georgia (15), Idaho (4), Indiana (11), Kansas (6), Kentucky (8), Louisiana (9), Mississippi (6), Missouri (11), Montana (3), Nebraska (5), North Carolina (15), North Dakota (3), Oklahoma (7), South Carolina (8), South Dakota (3), Tennessee (11), Texas (34), Utah (5), Virginia (13), and Wyoming (3).

The Kerry campaign made a stab at seven of these states, but it has now pulled its broadcast advertising out of them. With the exception of Colorado, Bush has now locked down all of the states that had just been "leaning" his way. Colorado is now a toss-up. So Bush is 62 electoral votes short of victory.

Kerry starts off with 12 jurisdictions that have a total of 168 electoral votes: California (55), Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), the District of Columbia (3), Hawaii (4), Illinois (21), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (12), New Jersey (15), New York (31), Rhode Island (4), and Vermont (3). Four more states are leaning toward Kerry: Maine (4), Michigan (17), Oregon (7), and Washington (11), bringing Kerry to 15 states plus the District. That's 207 electoral votes -- 63 short of the magic 270.

Still up for grabs are 123 electoral votes: Colorado (9), Florida (27), Iowa (7), Minnesota (10), Nevada (5), New Hampshire (4), New Mexico (5), Ohio (20), Pennsylvania (21), West Virginia (5), and Wisconsin (10).

Bush needs 62 of those votes; Kerry needs 63. Hard to get much more even than that.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.