Former Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in September.

Former Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in September. Susan Walsh/AP

Benghazi Committee Democrats to Release Full Interview With Top Hillary Clinton Aide

The move comes days after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy credited the panel with hurting Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Demo­crats on the House Se­lect Com­mit­tee on Benghazi will re­lease the tran­script of the pan­el’s closed-door in­ter­view last month with Cheryl Mills, a close con­fid­ante of Hil­lary Clin­ton’s who served as her chief of staff at the State De­part­ment.

In a let­ter to Trey Gowdy, the pan­el’s GOP lead­er, Demo­crats ac­cuse Re­pub­lic­ans of se­lect­ively leak­ing in­ac­cur­ate in­form­a­tion from the Septem­ber 3 in­ter­view.

“It has be­come ob­vi­ous that the only way to ad­equately cor­rect the pub­lic re­cord is to re­lease the com­plete tran­script of the com­mit­tee’s in­ter­view with Ms. Mills,” the let­ter states.

Demo­crats have pre­vi­ously—and un­suc­cess­fully—urged Re­pub­lic­ans to re­lease the full tran­scripts of closed-door in­ter­views of some wit­nesses, not­ably Sid­ney Blu­menth­al, a close Clin­ton ally who cor­res­pon­ded fre­quently with Clin­ton over her private email ac­count while she led State dur­ing Obama’s first term.

The de­cision to uni­lat­er­ally re­lease the tran­script ar­rives just days after widely cir­cu­lated com­ments by House Speak­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy, who is run­ning to re­place out­go­ing House Speak­er John Boehner, that have put Re­pub­lic­ans on the de­fens­ive about the Benghazi in­vest­ig­a­tion.

“Every­body thought Hil­lary Clin­ton was un­beat­able right? But we put to­geth­er a Benghazi spe­cial com­mit­tee. A se­lect com­mit­tee. What are her num­bers today?”Mc­Carthy said on Fox News late Tues­day night.

Demo­crats cite the com­ments in the open­ing of their let­ter as proof of their as­ser­tion that the com­mit­tee is de­signed as a polit­ic­al weapon.

The let­ter states: “On Septem­ber 29, 2015, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy ad­mit­ted dur­ing a na­tion­ally tele­vised in­ter­view on Fox News that House Re­pub­lic­ans cre­ated the Benghazi Se­lect Com­mit­tee from the very be­gin­ning to wage a tax­pay­er-fun­ded polit­ic­al cam­paign against Hil­lary Clin­ton’s bid for pres­id­ent. Ob­vi­ously, this is an un­eth­ic­al ab­use of mil­lions of tax­pay­er dol­lars and a crass as­sault on the memor­ies of the four Amer­ic­ans who were killed in Benghazi. Al­though some Re­pub­lic­ans at­temp­ted to ex­plain away Rep. Mc­Carthy’s ad­mis­sion, it re­flec­ted ex­actly what has been go­ing on with­in the Se­lect Com­mit­tee for the past year-and-a-half.”

Demo­crats, in the let­ter, say they do not take the de­cision to re­lease the Mills tran­script lightly, but say it stems from mul­tiple leaks from the com­mit­tee in­volving mul­tiple wit­nesses. They are sig­nal­ing that re­leases of tran­script from more closed-door in­ter­views are in the off­ing.

“We be­lieve it is time to be­gin re­leas­ing the tran­scripts of in­ter­views con­duc­ted by the Se­lect Com­mit­tee in or­der to cor­rect the pub­lic re­cord after nu­mer­ous in­ac­cur­ate Re­pub­lic­an leaks, and we plan to be­gin this pro­cess by re­leas­ing the full tran­script of Ms. Mills’s in­ter­view,” the let­ter states.

But the re­lease won’t be im­me­di­ate. In­stead Demo­crats say they’re giv­ing Re­pub­lic­ans, the State De­part­ment, and Mills’s law­yers five days to identi­fy any in­form­a­tion from the tran­script that should be with­held from the pub­lic.

Gowdy’s of­fice did not provide im­me­di­ate com­ment on the let­ter that Demo­crats de­livered late this morn­ing.

Demo­crats re­leased a few por­tions of the Mills in­ter­view Monday that they say con­tra­dict the “polit­ic­al nar­rat­ive” that Re­pub­lic­ans have tried to cre­ate about the 2012 Benghazi at­tacks, which claimed the lives of four Amer­ic­ans in­clud­ing Am­bas­sad­or Chris­toph­er Stevens.

For in­stance, in one se­quence Mills, in re­sponse to a ques­tion about wheth­er Clin­ton re­ques­ted that mil­it­ary as­sets be de­ployed, re­called a video­con­fer­ence in which Clin­ton “said we need to be tak­ing whatever steps we can, to do whatever we can to se­cure our people” and that “she was pretty em­phat­ic about want­ing whatever to be done and whatever were as­sets that could be de­ployed, if that was both ef­fect­ive and pos­sible to be done.”

The vow to re­lease the tran­scripts ar­rives on the same day that Clin­ton offered sharp words about the Benghazi com­mit­tee. She will testi­fy be­fore the pan­el on Oc­to­ber 22 in what will be among the closely watched events of the 2016 elec­tion cycle thus far.

“This com­mit­tee was set up, as they have ad­mit­ted, for the pur­pose of mak­ing a par­tis­an polit­ic­al is­sue out of the deaths of four Amer­ic­ans,” Clin­ton said on NBC’s “Today” show.

Asked if the com­mit­tee should be dis­ban­ded, as sev­er­al seni­or Demo­crat­ic law­makers have called for, Clin­ton said: “I have to say that now that they have ad­mit­ted it’s a polit­ic­al, par­tis­an com­mit­tee for the sole pur­pose of go­ing after me, not try­ing to make our dip­lo­mats who serve in dan­ger­ous areas safer, that’s up to the Con­gress.”