Another Agency Head Asks Congress for More Firing Authority

DEA chief Michelle Leonhart said civil service statutes prevent her from interfering with the disciplinary process. DEA chief Michelle Leonhart said civil service statutes prevent her from interfering with the disciplinary process. Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP file photo

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle on Tuesday relentlessly grilled the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration about the sexual misconduct of her agents and the lack of discipline they received, with several House members questioning her fitness to lead the organization.

DEA Administrator Michelle Leonhart -- who has worked in the agency for 35 years -- defended her leadership to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, saying she had no control over the punishment the agents received. Civil service statutes, she argued, prohibited her from interfering with the disciplinary process.

A recent report from the Justice Department’s inspector general found “systemic issues” within the agency that led to foreign DEA agents participating in “sex parties” with prostitutes funded by local drug cartels. The IG also found problematic enforcement of sexual harassment policies at DEA and the FBI, and that employees involved in harassment and the sex parties received suspensions rather than terminations.

Leonhart said the discipline for malfeasant employees is determined by the agency’s board of conduct and two “deciding officials.” Lawmakers repeatedly criticized that process, stating Leonhart did not have control over her own agency and that civil service laws would likely need to be changed.

The DEA administrator welcomed those proposals, saying she would appreciate an exemption from certain laws that would allow her to deal directly with the employees without internal or external review panels, such as the Merit Systems Protection Board.

“If you looked at giving us same the exemption as FBI I think we would then be able to make sure the penalties would be appropriate,” Leonhart said. “I think this is outrageous behavior, and without having to be concerned with appeal rights and sustaining it in MSPB, some of the behavior would rise to the level of removal.”

Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., typically a staunch defender of federal employees and their due process rights, embraced potential tweaks to DEA’s firing authority.

“I didn’t think this would be necessary, but we may have to change Title V to hold you accountable,” Lynch said. “Right now you can just pass it off.” He cited preliminary legislative language dealing with “criminal conduct that interferes with an agency’s ability to do its mission” as an outline for how Congress could make it easier to terminate employees. He also hinted at giving agencies additional authority to “claw back” pensions and salaries for individuals who violated the law.

“It’s a shame we have to get to this,” Lynch said, “but I think that’s where we are now.”

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, the committee’s chairman, said the DEA agents compromised national security and essentially were rewarded with a vacation, albeit unpaid. He added Leonhart owed it to the vast majority of DEA agents who do their jobs well to fire “bad apples.”

“It is incumbent upon the leadership of these law enforcement agencies to weed out employees who put our security at risk, embarrass the country and break the law,” Chaffetz said.

Leonhart repeatedly told the committee she too was “offended” by the actions of her workforce.

“Like you I am disgusted,” she said. “I am appalled by the behavior described in the report.” She added she has since “put mechanisms in place” to ensure that while she remains removed from the disciplinary process, more severe punishments are inflicted upon those found guilty of sexual harassment and misconduct.

Chafftez remained incredulous, saying her “mechanism” -- which consisted of sending out a memorandum last year to employees saying the behavior was unacceptable, similar to a memo Attorney General Eric Holder sent out last week -- did not go far enough.

“You may cry in the mirror but you were in a position to do it and you didn’t,” Chaffetz said. “It’s an embarrassment you don’t fire that person. It’s an embarrassment you don’t revoke that person’s security clearance.”

Rep. Jody Hice, R-Ga., took his criticism a step further.

“I have serious questions about your competence, quite frankly,” Hice said. “It appears to me we need to seriously consider new leadership at the DEA.” Democrats on the panel, such as the ranking member Elijah Cummings, Md., and Rep. Ted Lieu, Calif., also asked Leonhart if she thought she was fit to lead the agency.

Both the FBI and DEA were also criticized for their failures to cooperate with the IG’s investigation, further drawing the ire of committee members.

The agencies “impeded and obstructed our ability to move forward in a timely matter,” Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz said. “I think in this instance we were obstructed.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.