One Company Is Really Psyched About EPA's Big Climate-Change Rule

A coal-fired power plant near Price, Utah. A coal-fired power plant near Price, Utah. Flickr user arbyreed

Several big industry groups have come out with guns blazing against the Environmental Protection Agency's draft plan to slash carbon emissions from the nation's coal-fired power plants.

But some companies see opportunity in the regulation at the center of the White House climate-change agenda. Case in point: Opower, the software and data company that works with utilities to help customers save energy.

Improving energy efficiency is among the major ways that EPA envisions states and power companies complying with the regulation. Opower CEO Daniel Yates is happy about what that could mean for his company.

"These EPA guidelines will work their way through state governments over the next few years. This is just a first step, so there is no immediate impact on our business, but we expect it to be a powerful long-term driver for expansion of energy-efficiency policy and future opportunities," he told analysts on a conference call Tuesday, according to a transcript on the financial news website Seeking Alpha.

The rule has some heavy-hitting opposition from such groups as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers. But the Opower executive's new comments underscore how EPA's proposal means very different things for different types of companies.

parade of business and coal interests recently wrote a letter to EPA bashing the plan. Yet renewable-power interests are optimistic about the regulation that would push electricity production away from coal and toward cleaner-burning gas and renewables. The oil and gas industry's biggest trade group opposes the rule, but a separate group representing natural producers hasn't joined the attacks.

And the electric power industry is far from monolithic. How individual companies generate power (coal, gas, renewables, and nuclear), in what proportion, and their investment strategies will help dictate how those companies fare under the plan. How individual states implement the rule will also matter.

That variation is one reason why the Edison Electric Institute, which represents for-profit power companies, has issued only a rather neutral statement on the rule thus far.

The draft rule that EPA unveiled in June seeks to cut overall emissions from the nation's power sector by 30 percent by 2030. Yates, the Opower chief, cautioned Tuesday that the company doesn't expect "immediate impacts." This reflects the fact that the earliest that states would have to submit compliance plans is mid-2016, and the emissions curbs are phased in over 15 years.

"But we do feel really excited about its ability to expand efficiency, hopefully across every state in the country over the next several years," said Yates, whose company's paid advisory board includes former White House climate czar Carol Browner, GOP messaging guru Frank Luntz, and Jim Messina, who was President Obama's 2012 campaign manager.

(Image via Flickr user arbyreed)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.