Mike Rogers: Lawmakers Should Spend More Time in D.C.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich. J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Members of Congress don't spend enough time in Washington together doing detailed committee work required for expertise on the important issues confronting the nation, says outgoing House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers.

Huh?

That sure sounds like politically dangerous "inside-the-Beltway" apostasy that most lawmakers today would adamantly avoid and reject—at least publicly.

But Rogers, first elected to Congress in 2000, is not running for reelection this fall. He would lose his chairmanship because of House GOP term limits if he stayed, anyhow.

Instead, the Michigan Republican has already announced that he will join Cumulus Media after the end of this session as a radio host. And in some ways, it seems, he's already talking like an outside observer of Congress.

Speaking Wednesday to reporters on Capitol Hill during a Christian Science Monitor breakfast, Rogers did speak solemnly about Iraq and how the intelligence reporting from Iraq "sends chills down my spine" over the possibility of a terrorist attack against the United States.

But his conversation touched on other matters, including his belief that lawmakers needed to spend more time working within their committees and with each other in Washington.

"The problem we've gotten ourselves into in Congress is, we get yanked around in some of the populist trends at home," said Rogers.

He said that includes the notion that it's necessarily better for lawmakers to be at home—one example, he says, in which his party leadership has geared itself to "the smallest part of the majority."

But Rogers says the reality is that the less time spent in committee work and focusing on specific issues within the various topical committee jurisdictions, the more diminished that overall congressional expertise on those topics become.

"If every member is a generalist, then we are going to have a problem," he said.

He said there needs to be "more time in committee working on these issues; if that means staying in D.C. five days a week, then so be it."

In the weeks before Republicans took over the House majority in 2011, then-incoming Majority Leader Eric Cantor actually played up how the new House legislative calendar would be overhauled—including by giving members more time in their districts to listen to constituents.

What has been in place ever since is essentially a schedule of the House being in session for two weeks, followed by one week off. And rarely do session weeks last four days; more typically they last three.

Turns out, Rogers is not alone this week in his view that Congress is not in Washington enough and that lawmakers should place more emphasis on committee work.

On Tuesday, the Bipartisan Police Center's Commission on Political Reform released a "blueprint to strengthen our democracy." And in that report, the commission takes note that members are spending more time in their home districts, with shorter workweeks in Washington and more state and local "district work periods."

The report says, "Members typically arrive in Washington on Tuesday for votes scheduled to start in the evening that day and leave after votes on Thursday afternoon. This truncated schedule leaves only one full day—Wednesday—for committee hearings, markups, and the other necessary ingredients for fruitful legislating."

The commission does acknowledge that the media and potential opponents often criticize members for not spending maximum time in their district. But the upshot, it says, is that this has led to less interaction among members themselves, or time to make real overtures to each other on shared interests and issues.

The report goes on to say that "these developments have coincided with a decrease in the powers and influence of congressional committees and the centralization of power in the party leadership."

"The weakening of the committee system in Congress has had a very deleterious effect: It has deprived Congress of the opportunity to build stronger networks of expertise and experience, limited opportunities for collaboration and team-building, and contributed to a sense of disenfranchisement among many rank-and-file members," the report adds.

A solution offered by the commission: Changes to the legislative calendar that would include synchronized five-day workweeks in Washington for the House and Senate, with three weeks in session followed by one-week state and district work periods.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

    Download
  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

    Download
  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

    Download
  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

    Download
  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.