Congress Pushes Forward on Security Clearance Reform Bill

Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a co-author on the bill, said the law will help protect government workers from future attacks. Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a co-author on the bill, said the law will help protect government workers from future attacks. Charles Dharapak/AP file photo

The House has approved a Senate measure to bolster oversight of the security clearance process, providing funding for inspector general auditing of the investigations.

The Security Clearance Oversight and Reform Enhancement -- or SCORE -- Act enables the Office of Personnel Management to use its revolving fund -- an account the agencies that require background checks pay into -- to audit the investigations and investigators.

A bipartisan group of senators drafted the legislation after a hearing to investigate the security clearance process in light of Edward Snowden’s massive leak of National Security Agency documents revealed OPM’s revolving fund had no audit authority.

That version of the bill went significantly further to reform the process than the current bill, which, for procedural reasons, will have to clear the Senate one more time before heading to Obama’s desk. Originally, it called for the Director of National Intelligence to issue guidance for all federal agencies to determine which positions require security clearances. It also required the firing or suspension of background check investigators and contractors who falsified or filed incomplete reports. Those provisions, however, were stripped from the bill before it passed the Senate in October and the House earlier this week.

Still, the bill’s authors called the measure a step in the right direction toward fixing the gaps in the security clearance process.

“It’s nothing short of a national security threat that these background checks aren’t being conducted with the care needed,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., one of the bill’s sponsors. “The ability to conduct a basic audit is a good first step toward reforming the security clearance process, and making sure that we can trust those with access to our country’s secrets and secure facilities.”

Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a co-author on the bill, said the law will help protect government workers from future attacks, like the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard by government contractor Aaron Alexis that left 13 dead.

“Due to the NSA scandal and the terrible tragedy at the Washington Navy Yard, we know that our nation’s background check process badly needs reform -- and now Congress has acted,” Tester said. “This bipartisan bill will increase oversight and empower watchdogs to make our nation safer and our government more efficient.”

The White House is conducting its own review, in coordination with OPM, ODNI and the Office of Management and Budget, into the security clearance process, and is expected to issue its report in February. The Government Accountability Office has estimated 87 percent of investigations conducted for the Defense Department in a sample of 3,500 were incomplete.  

McCaskill and Tester, as well as the bill’s Republican co-sponsors, Sens. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., also wrote a letter to GAO asking the auditors to recommend how agencies can better streamline security clearance investigations. 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.