Congress Pushes Forward on Security Clearance Reform Bill

Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a co-author on the bill, said the law will help protect government workers from future attacks. Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a co-author on the bill, said the law will help protect government workers from future attacks. Charles Dharapak/AP file photo

The House has approved a Senate measure to bolster oversight of the security clearance process, providing funding for inspector general auditing of the investigations.

The Security Clearance Oversight and Reform Enhancement -- or SCORE -- Act enables the Office of Personnel Management to use its revolving fund -- an account the agencies that require background checks pay into -- to audit the investigations and investigators.

A bipartisan group of senators drafted the legislation after a hearing to investigate the security clearance process in light of Edward Snowden’s massive leak of National Security Agency documents revealed OPM’s revolving fund had no audit authority.

That version of the bill went significantly further to reform the process than the current bill, which, for procedural reasons, will have to clear the Senate one more time before heading to Obama’s desk. Originally, it called for the Director of National Intelligence to issue guidance for all federal agencies to determine which positions require security clearances. It also required the firing or suspension of background check investigators and contractors who falsified or filed incomplete reports. Those provisions, however, were stripped from the bill before it passed the Senate in October and the House earlier this week.

Still, the bill’s authors called the measure a step in the right direction toward fixing the gaps in the security clearance process.

“It’s nothing short of a national security threat that these background checks aren’t being conducted with the care needed,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., one of the bill’s sponsors. “The ability to conduct a basic audit is a good first step toward reforming the security clearance process, and making sure that we can trust those with access to our country’s secrets and secure facilities.”

Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a co-author on the bill, said the law will help protect government workers from future attacks, like the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard by government contractor Aaron Alexis that left 13 dead.

“Due to the NSA scandal and the terrible tragedy at the Washington Navy Yard, we know that our nation’s background check process badly needs reform -- and now Congress has acted,” Tester said. “This bipartisan bill will increase oversight and empower watchdogs to make our nation safer and our government more efficient.”

The White House is conducting its own review, in coordination with OPM, ODNI and the Office of Management and Budget, into the security clearance process, and is expected to issue its report in February. The Government Accountability Office has estimated 87 percent of investigations conducted for the Defense Department in a sample of 3,500 were incomplete.  

McCaskill and Tester, as well as the bill’s Republican co-sponsors, Sens. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., also wrote a letter to GAO asking the auditors to recommend how agencies can better streamline security clearance investigations. 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.