House Overseers Seek to Weld IRS Scandal to Obamacare Rollout

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif. Evan Vucci/AP

A long-silent Internal Revenue Service official delivered debut testimony Wednesday on her role in this spring’s scandal over the alleged targeting of tea-party conservatives, the result being a House panel fracturing over a smorgasbord of issues from the shutdown to the Obamacare rollout to religious liberty to unexplained executive visits to the White House.

Sarah Hall Ingram, the director of the IRS’ Affordable Care Act office who formerly ran the Exempt Organizations division where the targeting controversy originated, told lawmakers the IRS portion of implementing the health reform law was “launched on schedule and working as planned” with solid privacy protections in place.

She referred many policy questions on the disputed reforms to planners at the Health and Human Services Department, and she explained her nearly 80 visits to the White House – which conservatives saw as politically worrisome -- as “providing administrability analysis” of the law. She also noted the reported nearly 80 visits was misleading because she had a “repeating invite to attend as needed” and did not go to all the sessions, which were in the Old Executive Office Building, not the West Wing.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, convened the hearing with a slam at the Affordable Care Act. But the hearing broke down over debate on which witnesses the IRS could present, computer glitches faced by citizens seeking to enroll in state health insurance exchanges, and the dignity of federal civil servants.

“Obamacare’s first week has been a mess,” Issa said, “and there are no mulligans. The question is, did the IRS fail to plan or fail in an open and transparent way that is consistent with the law?”

Ranking Member Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., countered that “today’s hearing is an obvious attempt to link two issues that have nothing to do with each other: the implementation of the ACA and the so-called IRS Tea Party scandal.”

Cummings commended Ingram, not as the “mastermind” behind the targeting but as “a superstar,” noting that she left the Exempt Organizations division to work on health care a full six months before the alleged targeting of certain applicants for tax-exempt status. He also noted that Ingram in 2004 was among recipients of the Distinguished Presidential Rank Award, won a large bonus, and had her photo taken with dozens of fellow winners with President George W. Bush.

Cummings and Issa squabbled over whether that photo should be displayed and whether it proved that Republican-favored IRS employees were not capable of targeting conservatives. They argued over whether Issa was proper in confining the witness list to Ingram, when Cummings said acting IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel had wanted to send a team of four who are currently working on document production for the committee and the Affordable Care Act.

“In my 17 years here,” Cummings said, “I’ve never seen a chairman tell the head of an agency that he can’t be present at a public hearing at which one of his employees is appearing.”

Issa replied, “Elections have consequences, and the decision to have the head of implementation appear was mine.”

The pre-testimony fireworks continued. “What does she know that IRS doesn’t want this committee to know,” asked Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. He noted the presence of Ingram’s name in the minutes of a May meeting of the IRS Oversight Board at which she updated colleagues on the health care law’s implementation. “It took us nearly five months to get her to come here, why?”

Jordan and Issa’s chief issue with Ingram was the presence of her name on heavily redacted emails dealing with meetings at the White House discussing a lawsuit from 58 religious groups protesting their obligation to offer plans under the Affordable Care Act. “The documents indicate that Hall Ingram and her subordinates violated the IRS’ traditional role as an impartial administrator of the tax code by using their expertise and knowledge to advise the White House on a politically controversial subject: the four-prong test for religious exemption to the contraception mandate,” the lawmakers said in a press release.

Ingram, an attorney with 31 years in government, said implementation of the tax portions of the health care law is a “collaborative work of all parts of IRS. My office is only one piece, and is separate,” she said, from offices dealing with the law’s technology, business processes and from the chief counsel’s office. “The major effort is delivery of the premium tax credit,” she added, citing three categories: information technology to share data with states; protections of taxpayer privacy; and updating and improving business procedures.

“I’m pleased to report that all was launched on schedule and [everything is] working as planned,” she said, including answering user questions within certain turnaround times and preparing health insurance applicants’ income verification reporting in time for the 2015 tax season.

Ingram did not shed light on the blacked-out information on Issa’s redacted emails. “I get hundreds of emails a day and can’t recall what’s in every one,” she said. “But we take Section 6103 [the privacy protection provision in the tax code] very seriously,” she said, noting that the health law allows certain exceptions on data to determine applicant eligibility for subsidies.

Issa was not satisfied and demanded that the IRS deliver unredacted versions of the emails before the hearing’s end. (Werfel later told Issa that would not be feasible, Issa told the panel at the end of the session, and he vowed to obtain the full emails later.)

Under questioning from Democrats, Ingram said she witnessed no political targeting at IRS, attributing the invocation of her name to a misunderstanding of her role based on the fact that her official title didn’t change to reflect her health responsibilities until three years after she left Exempt Organizations.

But she said she was upset when she skimmed the May audit from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration that set off the scandal. “I don’t think it’s ever OK to use people’s political viewpoints when managing” a project at the agency, she said. “I don’t personally engage in public debate on investigations, but over my career, when investigations show things that are not going right,” she added, “I always thought TIGTA was the appropriate place to turn to.”

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., asked her how the IRS is getting by with 90 percent furloughs. “A small number trying to keep things going,” Ingram said.

Rep. Gerald Connolly, D-Va., baffled the witness by asking with sarcasm if she’d read the play “The Crucible,” which portrays the Salem Witch trials. He asked her if she “consorted with the devil” (not knowingly, she said). “Can you fly?” (that’s exaggerated, she replied), and “Have you corrupted youth?" (She said she hoped not.) “I regret you’re being pilloried like those in 'The Crucible,' ” Connolly said.

Rep. John Duncan Jr., R-Tenn., said, “This not a joke,” given that the administration had 42 months to prepare for what he sees as the health care law’s inauspicious debut.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.