Analysis: Senator Julian Assange, Care of Edward Snowden

Flickr user bbwbryant

Julian Assange may not be able to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. But that's not stopping him from announcing a campaign for the Senate in Australia.

On Thursday, Assange announced seven candidates from his WikiLeaks Party for the Senate elections this year. One of those candidates is Assange himself. Assange has been stuck in the embassy for over a year now, avoiding extradition to Sweden where he is wanted over charges of sexual assault. But the isolation hasn't been all bad for Assange. In the last month, he's even managed to regain some of the spotlight that could be a boost for his senate campaign. That boost is, of course, NSA leaker Edward Snowden.

Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have taken some command over the Snowden situation in the last month, helping him evade U.S. authorities in getting out of Hong Kong, paying for Snowden's travel and legal assistance, and helping his search for asylum. WikiLeaks has also acted as something of a public-relations in-between for Snowden, issuing press releases on his behalf. In a June interview on ABC's This Week, Assange sought to benefit from the then-mixed opinions that many in the world felt about Snowden, saying that the two of them were in a "very similar" situation.

For Snowden, the relationship with WikiLeaks hasn't been all beneficial. Assange's aggressive involvement in the case apparently helped to turn Ecuador's President Rafael Correa against giving Snowden asylum. And the continued connection between Snowden and WikiLeaks may not do much to improve goodwill towards Snowden: a CNN poll in late 2010 found that 77 percent of Americans disapproved of the organization's leaks, and a Washington Post poll from the same time found that 59 percent of Americans thought Assange should be arrested by the U.S. government.

For WikiLeaks and Assange though, Edward Snowden has been a revelation. By early July, WikiLeaks had raised about $1,300 a day since joining up with Snowden. And as Caitlin Dickson and Eliza Shapiro write for The Daily Beast, WikiLeaks can seriously use the money. A founding member of the organization that manages WikiLeaks' finances said that "the level of donation rises whenever the organization is in the press." And the boost in press is evident just from a quick search on Google Trends alone: In the last year, "WikiLeaks" was only searched more (by a hefty margin) when Assange was granted asylum from Ecuador. That extra money could obviously help fuel a political campaign (Australia does not ban foreign political donations right now, although there has been some movement toward reform).

A June poll from before WikiLeaks tied itself to Snowden showed that the WikiLeaks Party may actually have a shot in Australia. A survey from Morgan Poll found that 21 percent of Australian voters would consider voting for Assange's party, which is more support than any other new parties received. If he should actually win, Assange says his plan is "to essentially parachute in a crack troop of investigative journalists into the Senate and to do what we have done with WikiLeaks, in holding banks and government and intelligence agencies to account."

But what would happen if Assange actually wins a Senate seat, but isn't able to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy? Assange said this question is "extremely interesting." He said he would plan on putting forward a replacement candidate from the WikiLeaks Party to hold the seat until he is able to take his place.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.