Lawmakers differ on congressional investigation into Libya

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said the congressional investigation is “turning into a witch hunt.” Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said the congressional investigation is “turning into a witch hunt.” Gerald Herbert/AP file photo
As Congress continues its investigation into the terrorist attack that left four Americans dead in Libya, Democratic lawmakers are accusing the Republican majority in the House of playing politics.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said the congressional investigation that aims to find out how much the Obama administration knew following the attack is “turning into a witch hunt.”

“We will search the killers down and bring them to justice. The one thing we must not do, though, is … treat it like political football,” he said on CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday. “We have a situation where we rushed to a hearing. We don't have substantial evidence yet.”

Cummings also accused Republicans on the Hill of scheduling the hearing to benefit their nominee for president, Mitt Romney.

“The way we're doing it, I think, is basically based on a campaign schedule, trying to give Romney some talking points,” he said. “But I don't think that our men who were killed deserve this. I don't think our diplomatic corps deserves this. We can do better.”

But Republicans argued that the administration's reaction following the attack in Libya is worthy of inquiry. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said the administration is either “misleading or they’re incredibly incompetent,” adding that Libya has become President Obama’s “Mission Accomplished” moment, a reference to President George W. Bush's handling of Iraq.

“This whole region is about to explode. Al-Qaida is on the march,” he said on the same show. “The Middle East is falling apart, and they're trying to spin what happened in Libya, because the truth of the matter is, al-Qaida is alive and well and counter-attacking.”

During the vice presidential debate, one of the attacks that Vice President Joe Biden used against Rep. Paul Ryan was an item in the Republican’s budget proposal that Biden claimed would cut money for embassy security. “The congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for,” Biden said on Thursday.

However, in defending Ryan, House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said what happened in Libya was not an issue of money, but of security. He claimed that there is plenty of money in a discretionary fund for security. The State Department, he said, “didn't want the appearance of needing the security.”

“They are making a decision not to put security in because they don't want the presence of security,” he said on CBS, later adding, “The money was there, they chose not to have those security personnel on the ground in Libya.”
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.