Interior’s reorganization after Gulf oil spill falls short

AP photo

More than two years after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill tainted the Gulf of Mexico, the Interior Department’s attempt to segregate safety monitoring from minerals management oversight in a major reorganization has produced mixed results, auditors found.

In a report on Interior’s progress released Wednesday, the Government Accountability Office pointed to missing data and an inability to gauge risk in overseeing oil and gas exploration. The department’s reorganization eliminated the Minerals Management Service after the April 20, 2010, tragedy that killed 11 people, scarred the environment over hundreds of miles and dampened local economies.

The restructuring, completed on time in October 2011, transferred MMS’ gas oil and gas revenue collection functions to a new Office of Natural Resources Revenue and then created the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement.

The GAO report, dated July 30, was addressed to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., of the Environment and Public Works Committee, and Rep. Nick J. Rahall II, D-W.Va., of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

Because the three bureaus’ responsibilities for environmental analysis and reviews of permits and inspections of drilling rigs “are closely interconnected and will depend on effective coordination, Interior developed memoranda and standard operating procedures to define roles and responsibilities and facilitate and formalize coordination,” the study said.

Even though Interior’s inspections of rigs and platforms in the Gulf has uncovered numerous violations, the department’s “database is missing data on when violations were identified, as well as violation correction dates for about half the violations issued,” the auditors found. “As a result, Interior does not know on a real-time basis whether or when all violations were identified and corrected, potentially allowing unsafe conditions to continue for extended periods.”

The department’s efforts to seek input on proposed oil and gas exploration projects generally were well-received by government stakeholders, but industry and conservation groups were less satisfied, auditors found.

“Interior’s capacity to identify and evaluate risk remains limited, raising questions about the effectiveness with which it allocates its oversight resources,” GAO wrote. “Interior also continues to experience difficulties in implementing effective information technology systems, such as those that aid exploration and development plan reviews. It also continues to face workforce planning challenges, including hiring, retaining and training staff. Moreover, Interior does not have current strategic plans to guide its information technology or workforce planning efforts.”

Interior officials, after reviewing a draft of the report, generally accepted the criticisms.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.