Senators barrage GSA with new questions on conference scandal

The conference in question was held at the M Resort and Casino in Las Vegas. The conference in question was held at the M Resort and Casino in Las Vegas. Flickr user Exothermic

Leaders of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Monday asked the acting chief of the scandal-tarnished General Services Administration to review the agency’s conference spending and travel, and posed 41 detailed, multipart questions on lavish spending on the ill-fated training conference held in Las Vegas in October 2010.

In a letter to acting Administrator Dan Tangherlini and GSA Inspector General Brian Miller, Chairman Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., and ranking member Susan Collins, R-Maine, sought clarification on GSA’s overall financial management, its leaders’ control over its 10 administrative regions, and its spending policies on conferences and contracting.

“The waste, excessive spending and possible fraud uncovered as a result of this investigation and continuing investigations cause us great concern,” they wrote. “It is never appropriate for an agency to skirt acquisition rules and policies and waste taxpayer dollars in the process. These issues are even more troubling given GSA’s unique and lead role in contracting and management of travel and conference planning.”

The senators recommended that GSA’s chief financial officer review recent conferences for possible waste as well a sampling of per diem expenses.

The 41 questions, presented with a deadline of May 31, addressed the scope of GSA’s current “top-to-bottom review.” They asked what changes GSA has made since the overspending was made public in early April and posed various general questions about lines of reporting within GSA when it comes to approval for travel and conferences. In addition, the senators asked for a review of disciplinary actions that have been taken against employees involved in planning the Las Vegas conference.

The letter also requested information on the steps GSA has taken to comply with President Obama’s November 2011 executive order promoting efficient spending. “We often hear that GSA considers itself different from other agencies because, although part of its budget is appropriated, much of its operating budget comes from fees other federal agencies pay to GSA out of their own appropriated accounts in exchange for services GSA provides,” the senators wrote. “GSA’s employees, therefore, may be less conscious of budget constraints than agencies that rely on appropriations. What will you do to instill in the mind-set of GSA employees that they are first and foremost the stewards of taxpayer dollars?”

Asked for a response, GSA Deputy Press Secretary Adam Elkington said in an email to Government Executive that the 2010 conference was an anomaly. “We were appalled by the missteps highlighted in the IG's report, have taken disciplinary action against those responsible, accepted all of the IG’s recommendations and are conducting a top-down review of our agency’s operations,” he said. “We welcome responsible oversight and look forward to working with the committee on this matter. Our agency remains committed to eliminating excessive federal spending and promoting government efficiency.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.