Measures to stop ‘back-door’ base closures win approval in House and Senate

Rahmatullah Naikzad/AP file photo

Both chambers of Congress have approved measures that attempt to stop the Defense Department from conducting what lawmakers call “backdoor” closures of military bases.

The Senate Armed Services Committee included a provision in its markup of the fiscal 2013 National Defense Authorization Bill this week that would temporarily prohibit the Pentagon from reducing the number of civilian personnel at a base to less than 300.

The provision was penned by Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, after he and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, pressed Air Force officials in April on their plans to transfer an F-16 squadron at Eielson Air Force Base to joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in their state. Defense officials anticipated the move could save $3.5 million in fiscal 2013 and $169.5 million during the next five years.

The senators were concerned the transfers would circumvent the formal Base Closure and Realignment Commission process, which they say would be preferable because it requires more congressional scrutiny and review of Defense proposals.

House lawmakers have similar concerns about BRAC “loopholes.” Rep. Don Young, R.-Alaska, and Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Pa., authored a nearly identical amendment included in the House version of the Defense authorization bill passed earlier this month. The Air Force also is proposing reallocating C-130 aircraft from a reserve at the Pittsburgh International Airport.

Defense believes it can shutter facilities where there are fewer than 300 personnel without using the formal BRAC process, a strategy that also has been unpopular with lawmakers. Defense officials also threatened to act outside the BRAC process on any base closure if they do not receive congressional approval to reconvene the commission.

Dorothy Robyn, deputy undersecretary of Defense for installations and environment, told lawmakers in April that the Pentagon wants to avoid a nonofficial BRAC approach because the department would be constrained in what it could do to help local communities affected by the closures.

The Senate’s recent markup of the Pentagon’s fiscal 2013 request included no authorization for the additional round of BRAC closures the department requested.

A spokesman for Murphy argued the department sees realignments in Alaska and Pennsylvania as “low-hanging fruit” to undergo an easier process than a formal BRAC due to personnel numbers hovering around 300.

Begich said the Senate committee’s bill also requires the development of objective criteria for Defense to ensure its decisions on realignments are “not biased and are appropriately analyzed.”

The panel also rejected an increase in TRICARE fees and deductibles for service members and their families that the Pentagon requested earlier this year. The House-passed version of the bill includes modest increases to some TRICARE drug co-pays.

The bill now goes to the full Senate for consideration. More details from the committee markup are expected to be published next week.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.