Senator moves to end minting of largely ignored presidential coins

Lawmakers appeared optimistic when they enacted the 2005 Presidential Dollar Coin Act to honor all 44 U.S. chief executives on a $1 piece by 2016. But after a scathing news report on NPR this summer documented how few American consumers or collectors have warmed to the coins, a senator is proposing to halt production.

Sen. David Vitter, R-La., on Wednesday, introduced a bill (S.1385) to repeal the law and save taxpayers money just as the U.S. Mint is rolling out the edition of the coins honoring the 18th president, Ulysses S. Grant.

"Even though many in Congress, including myself, hoped that dollar coins would eventually save taxpayers money, it's turned out to be one of those unnecessary and, quite frankly, wasteful programs that we should eliminate," Vitter said. "Banks and credit unions are increasingly returning the dollar coins to the Federal Reserve because people don't want them and aren't using them. So the most sensible thing to do is for Congress to quit spending taxpayer dollars producing and storing the unwanted coins."

Some 1.252 billion presidential $1 coins are currently sitting in plastic bags or boxes on shelves in vaults in Philadelphia and Baltimore, according to the Federal Reserve. A Government Accountability Office report dealing with the broader issue of paper-versus-metal dollars projected that the total in presidential coins will soon exceed 2 billion.

The cost of making the coins -- about 32 cents each, or $576,000 per day -- is only part of the story because the government is running out of space to store them. The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas is preparing to build a new storage vault at a cost of $650,000, to which must be added $3 million to move the coins south in armored trucks and $1.4 million for new pallets and building renovations, according to a press release from Vitter.

The 2005 law and a similar 2007 law on coins honoring Native Americans require the Mint to identify and overcome barriers to wider circulation of the coins. To promote their use, the Mint recently partnered with Walt Disney Resorts, Whole Foods in North Carolina, and Army and Air Force Exchange Service stores at four military bases, according to a December 2010 Treasury Department Inspector General's audit.

The Federal Reserve, however, is less than hopeful. In a June 2010 report, analysts wrote that "for previous $1 coin programs, the Reserve Banks encountered large excess inventories for much longer periods because demand was very low.

"The Presidential $1 Coin Program experience is consistent with those other $1 coin programs," the report said. "Dollar coin payments to circulation increased significantly in the first year of the program, but have consistently declined since that time . . . We have no reason to expect demand to improve."

Vitter has a co-sponsor in Jim DeMint, R-S.C., and one of the 2005 bill's sponsors, Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., told ABC News on July 14 that he believes Congress should consider ending production of the coins.

Former Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., who lost his reelection bid last November, was an original sponsor of both the bill for the presidential coins and a later coin honoring Sacagawea, a Native American interpreter on the Lewis and Clark Expedition. But Pomeroy told NPR in June that it is foolish to assume that "with no one picking up these coins, we've got to keep printing them because we've got to get through the rest of the presidents list.

"Is the nation waiting with bated breath for us to get to the Calvin Coolidge coin?" he asked. "Maybe we should call a halt to this whole thing."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.