HUD rebuts charge of illegal grant to ACORN

The Housing and Urban Development Department has denied a charge leveled this week by the conservative anti-corruption group Judicial Watch that an $80,000 grant to an affordable housing group goes against the ban on funding of the controversial community organizing group ACORN.

On July 5, Judicial Watch issued a statement criticizing a March 1 HUD announcement of a $79,819 grant to the Affordable Housing Centers of America "to educate the public and housing providers about their rights and obligations under federal, state and local fair housing laws."

AHCOA, the watchdog group says, is an offshoot of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, funding for which was banned by Congress under a 2009 law signed by President Obama following embarrassing revelations about alleged willingness of ACORN branches to counsel community residents to violate tax and anti-prostitution laws.

Judicial Watch, noting the law's language banning funds to "ACORN or any ACORN-related affiliate," also cited a pair of 2010 HUD inspector general reports documenting irregularities in AHCOA's work with the community action group during the past decade.

The Government Accountability Office, however, in a September 2010 opinion reiterated reiterated last month, said, "HUD determined that for purposes of its 2010 agency's appropriations restrictions that ACHOA was not a subsidiary, affiliate or allied organization of ACORN, and a GAO appropriations decision concluded that as of September 2010, ACHOA was not a subsidiary, affiliate or allied organization of ACORN."

On Wednesday, HUD issued its own response, saying its grant to ACHOA is in complete compliance with the law.

"In April, HUD awarded a $79,819 grant to AHCOA to provide fair housing and fair lending information and assistance to at least 35,000 minority, non-English speaking and immigrant households in the Miami-Dade metropolitan area," it said. "After the award of the grant, AHCOA submitted its tax identification number, which was entered into a government database, which still associated the number with the organization's previous name.

"GAO has confirmed and opined in a Sept. 29, 2010, letter that, among other findings, 'The record does not show AHCOA to be directly or indirectly under the control of ACORN. AHCOA is not related to ACORN by shareholdings. Because AHCOA is organized as a nonstock corporation, ACORN cannot own shares in AHCOA . . . AHCOA also does not own any shares of ACORN,' concluding 'it is our view that AHCOA is not presently an affiliate, subsidiary or allied organization of ACORN' and that 'AHCOA does not currently fall within the scope of Section 418 of the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act [of] 2010.' "

Correction: The original version of this story included a typo in the first reference to the group Judicial Watch.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.