National Science Foundation nears decision on moving

"Welcome to the new home of the National Science Foundation."

That greeting, posted briefly on a banner last month at the Victory Center office complex in Alexandria, Va., was jumping the gun. But officials have confirmed that NSF is pondering a move out of its headquarters in the Washington suburb of Arlington, Va.

As reported this week in Northern Virginia-based, the 2,100-employee agency requires space to grow its staff of scientists and grant makers, who have bumped up against a rent cap that the Office of Management and Budget has declined to raise.

According to Kerry Donley, vice mayor of the nearby City of Alexandria, officials from the General Services Administration and NSF accompanied him to four prospective sites in Alexandria in May, all of which met the criteria of being close to Metro. "My understanding is that the GSA will go through a quick process, cutting about 20 possible sites down to, say, 10 by midfall, then reduce it to two or three and make a decision by the end of the year," Donley told Government Executive.

NSF officials will not discuss particulars. Said media officer Maria Zacharias: "Our lease is up in 2013, and will be competed to get the best value for the government and taxpayer."

Donley cited Alexandria's success a decade ago in luring the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office from Arlington's Crystal City to a new office complex near Metro. NSF officials told him their current space is constrained and short on conference rooms. "It would be a tremendous benefit, a wonderful entity for Alexandria," Donley said.

According to coverage this spring in Washington Business Journal citing a GSA prospectus, NSF requires an increase from 556,466 square feet to 690,000 square feet, and is unable to build out on its current site because of OMB's denial of a waiver on exceeding the federal rent cap.

If a move is made, it won't be without input from Capitol Hill. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., this April released a report attacking NSF for allegedly wasteful spending. He mentioned its "pricey rent."

"NSF's headquarters in Arlington…currently costs taxpayers $39 per square foot, or $26 million annually," the report said. "NSF's lease is expiring in two years and the agency is currently making plans to lease or construct an entire new building -- requesting $45 million in 2012 just to customize and [make] technology enhancements to their future headquarters . . . According to documents, among the reasons NSF is looking to move from its Ballston . . . headquarters is the desire to become more environmentally friendly and create a larger lobby and space for a museum and an auditorium."

Early in the discussion, Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., and Virginia's Democratic Sens. Mark Warner and Jim Webb opposed any move. "We urge you to take into account recent developments that we believe continue to make Arlington the ideal location for NSF headquarters," they said in a February 2010 letter to GSA, citing benefits from being nearby the Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency and Virginia Tech's technology center.

"Arlington County is a national epicenter for scientific research, particularly in the areas of defense and homeland security," the letter stated. "Not only does [Ballston] provide these agencies with access to one of the most highly educated and highly trained workforces in the nation, it also provides them with immediate access to a large pool of technical experts in the contracting community as well."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.